Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Physicians' preferences and willingness to pay for artificial intelligence-based assistance tools: a discrete choice experiment among german radiologists.
von Wedel, Philip; Hagist, Christian.
  • von Wedel P; Chair of Economic and Social Policy, WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management, Burgplatz 2, 56179, Vallendar, Germany. philip.wedel@whu.edu.
  • Hagist C; Chair of Economic and Social Policy, WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management, Burgplatz 2, 56179, Vallendar, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 398, 2022 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1793948
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based assistance tools have the potential to improve the quality of healthcare when adopted by providers. This work attempts to elicit preferences and willingness to pay for these tools among German radiologists. The goal was to generate insights for tool providers and policymakers regarding the development and funding of ideally designed and priced tools. Ultimately, healthcare systems can only benefit from quality enhancing AI when provider adoption is considered.

METHODS:

Since there is no established market for AI-based assistance tools in radiology yet, a discrete choice experiment was conducted. Respondents from the two major German professional radiology associations chose between hypothetical tools composed of five attributes and a no-choice option. The attributes included provider, application, quality impact, time savings and price. A conditional logit model was estimated identifying preferences for attribute levels, the no-choice option, and significant subject-related interaction effects.

RESULTS:

114 respondents were included for analysis of which 46% were already using an AI-based assistance tool. Average adoption probability for an AI-based tool was 81% (95% CI 77.1% - 84.4%). Radiologists preferred a tool that assists in routine diagnostics performing at above-radiologist-level quality and saves 50% in diagnostics time at a price-point of €3 per study. The provider is not a significant factor in the decisions. Time savings were considered more important than quality improvements (i.e., detecting more anomalies).

CONCLUSIONS:

Radiologists are overall willing to invest in AI-based assistance tools. Development, funding, and research regarding these tools should, however, consider providers' preferences for features of immediate everyday and economic relevance like time savings to optimize adoption.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Artificial Intelligence Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-022-07769-x

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiology / Artificial Intelligence Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-022-07769-x