Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of ß-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring among US health systems with postgraduate year 2 infectious diseases pharmacy residency programs.
Chen, Chieh; Seabury, Robert W; Steele, Jeffrey M; Parsels, Katie A; Darko, William; Miller, Christopher D; Kufel, Wesley D.
  • Chen C; State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Seabury RW; State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Steele JM; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Parsels KA; State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Darko W; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Miller CD; State University of New York Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, NY, USA.
  • Kufel WD; State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 79(15): 1273-1280, 2022 07 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1795385
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

While some guidelines recognize the need for ß-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), there is still a paucity of data regarding the prevalence of and barriers to performing ß-lactam TDM in the United States. We sought to estimate the prevalence of ß-lactam TDM, describe monitoring practices, and identify actual and perceived barriers to implementation among health systems in the US.

METHODS:

A multicenter, cross-sectional, 40-item electronic survey was distributed to all postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs) listed in the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists pharmacy residency directory. The primary outcome was the percentage of institutions with established ß-lactam TDM. Secondary outcomes included assessing ß-lactam TDM methods and identifying potential barriers to implementation.

RESULTS:

The survey was distributed to 126 PGY2 ID RPDs, with a response rate of 31.7% (40 of 126). Only 8% of respondents (3 of 39) performed ß-lactam TDM. Patient populations, therapeutic targets, and frequency and timing of obtaining repeat ß-lactam concentration measurements varied among institutions. The greatest barrier to implementation was lack of access to testing with a rapid turnaround time. Institutions were unlikely to implement ß-lactam TDM within the next year but were significantly more inclined to do so within 5 years (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

ß-lactam TDM was infrequently performed at the surveyed US health systems. Lack of access to serum concentration testing with rapid turnaround and lack of US-specific guidelines appear to be considerable barriers to implementing ß-lactam TDM. Among institutions that have implemented ß-lactam TDM, there is considerable variation in monitoring approaches.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Communicable Diseases / Pharmacy Residencies Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: Pharmacy / Hospitals Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajhp

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Communicable Diseases / Pharmacy Residencies Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Journal subject: Pharmacy / Hospitals Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ajhp