Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Psychological Stress Reported at the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Subsequent Stress and Successful Coping in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: A Longitudinal Analysis.
Duculan, Roland; Jannat-Khah, Deanna; Wang, Xin A; Mancuso, Carol A.
  • Wang XA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(5): 250-256, 2022 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1806748
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

In a cohort assembled during the height of mortality-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in New York City, the objectives of this qualitative-quantitative mixed-methods study were to assess COVID-related stress at enrollment with subsequent stress and clinical and behavioral characteristics associated with successful coping during longitudinal follow-up.

METHODS:

Patients with rheumatologist-diagnosed rheumatic disease taking immunosuppressive medications were interviewed in April 2020 and were asked open-ended questions about the impact of COVID-19 on psychological well-being. Stress-related responses were grouped into categories. Patients were interviewed again in January-March 2021 and asked about interval and current disease status and how well they believed they coped. Patients also completed the 29-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) measuring physical and emotional health during both interviews.

RESULTS:

Ninety-six patients had follow-ups; 83% were women, and mean age was 50 years. Patients who reported stress at enrollment had improved PROMIS-29 scores, particularly for the anxiety subscale. At the follow-up, patients reported persistent and new stresses as well as numerous self-identified coping strategies. Overall coping was rated as very well (30%), well (48%), and neutral-fair-poor (22%). Based on ordinal logistic regression, variables associated with worse overall coping were worse enrollment-to-follow-up PROMIS-29 anxiety (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; confidence interval [CI], 1.1-17.3; p = 0.03), not reporting excellent/very good disease status at follow-up (OR, 2.7; CI, 1.1-6.5; p = 0.03), pandemic-related persistent stress (OR, 5.7; CI, 1.6-20.1; p = 0.007), and pandemic-related adverse long-lasting effects on employment (OR, 6.1; CI, 1.9-20.0; p = 0.003) and health (OR, 3.0; CI, 1.0-9.0; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study reflects the evolving nature of COVID-related psychological stress and coping, with most patients reporting they coped well. For those not coping well, multidisciplinary health care providers are needed to address long-lasting pandemic-associated adverse consequences.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rheumatic Diseases / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Journal subject: Physiology / Orthopedics / Rheumatology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rheumatic Diseases / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Journal subject: Physiology / Orthopedics / Rheumatology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article