Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Real-world use of inhaled nitric oxide therapy in patients with COVID-19 and mild-to-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Abman, Steven H; Fox, Nicholas R; Malik, M Ibrahim; Kelkar, Sneha S; Corman, Shelby L; Rege, Sanika; Bhaloo, Jenna; Shah, Rachel; Shei, Ren-Jay; Saporito, Dana; Shamseddine, Nisreen; DeBoer, Erik; Wan, George J.
  • Abman SH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Fox NR; Piedmont Athens Regional, Athens Pulmonary, Athens, GA, USA.
  • Malik MI; Piedmont Athens Regional, Athens Pulmonary, Athens, GA, USA.
  • Kelkar SS; OPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Corman SL; OPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Rege S; OPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Bhaloo J; OPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Shah R; OPEN Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Shei RJ; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hampton, NJ, USA.
  • Saporito D; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hampton, NJ, USA.
  • Shamseddine N; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hampton, NJ, USA.
  • DeBoer E; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hampton, NJ, USA.
  • Wan GJ; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Hampton, NJ, USA.
Drugs Context ; 112022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1811229
ABSTRACT

Background:

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been studied in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 when it may be too late to impact disease course. This article aims to describe real-world iNO use and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 with mild-to-moderate ARDS in the United States.

Methods:

This was a retrospective medical chart review study that included patients who were ≥18 years old, hospitalized for COVID-19, met the Berlin ARDS definition, received iNO for ≥24 hours continuously during hospitalization, and had a partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio (P/F ratio) of >100 to ≤300 mmHg at iNO initiation. Outcomes included oxygenation parameters, physician-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale scores, and adverse events. Response to iNO was defined as >20% improvement in P/F ratio.

Results:

Thirty-seven patients at six sites were included. A P/F ratio of ≤100 was the most common reason for exclusion (n=146; 83% of excluded patients). The mean P/F ratio (SD) increased from 136.7 (34.4) at baseline to 140.3 (53.2) at 48 hours and 151.8 (50.0) at 72 hours after iNO initiation. The response rate was 62% (n=23). During hospitalization, no patient experienced adverse events, including methemoglobinaemia, airway injury, or worsening pulmonary oedema associated with iNO. At discharge, 54.0% (n=20) of patients improved or remained stable according to the CGI-I.

Conclusion:

In patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and mild-to-moderate ARDS, iNO was associated with improvement in the P/F ratio with no reported toxicity. This study provides additional evidence supporting a favourable benefit-risk profile for iNO in the treatment of mild-to-moderate ARDS in patients with COVID-19 infection.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Dic.2022-1-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Dic.2022-1-4