Your browser doesn't support javascript.
E-Learning during COVID-19: perspectives and experiences of the faculty and students.
Li, Sisi; Zhang, Chunhui; Liu, Qijun; Tong, Kuang.
  • Li S; Center for Teaching and Learning Development, Southern Medical University, Shatai Road 1023, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
  • Zhang C; Office of Academic Affairs, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Shatai Road 1023, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
  • Liu Q; Center for Teaching and Learning Development, Southern Medical University, Shatai Road 1023, Baiyun District, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
  • Tong K; Office of Academic Affairs, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Shatai Road 1023, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. ktong78@163.com.
BMC Med Educ ; 22(1): 328, 2022 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1817216
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Aimed to corroborate students' and faculty's experiences with e-learning during the current pandemic.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to June 2020. Seven surveys were distributed electronically to all undergraduate students and the faculty (4 to students and 3 to teachers) at the Southern Medical University (China). Descriptive statistics and t-tests were used to analyze the data. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

RESULTS:

Most students had some exposure to e-learning prior to the all e-learning regiment, contrasted with close to 90% of teachers having no or very limited experience. Students' perceptions of the most helpful e-learning activities did not change significantly overall (Week 3 vs. Week 9). Approaching 60% of students (Week 9) did find online discussion/Q&A/forum helpful, an increase from less than 30% (Week 3). Among teachers, gaps emerged (Week 9) between e-teaching activities used and their perceived effectiveness. Despite pre-recorded lectures being the most frequently used method, the least gap was associated with live-stream lectures-the least used. Over time, teacher's perceived effectiveness of e-teaching vs. in-person teaching did not differ significantly overall. When the results among students (Week 7) and teachers (Week 9) were corroborated, a slightly higher percentage of teachers viewed online teaching to be less effective than in-person teaching and a slightly higher percentage of teachers viewed online teaching as far less effective. For preferred learning modes after the resumption of in-person learning, students' preferences did not differ significantly overall (Week 3 vs. week 9). Surveys conducted in Week 9 found that a slightly higher percentage of students (~ 70%) than teachers (~ 60%) preferred some forms of hybrid learning and a lower percentage of students preferred face-to-face learning only. Approximately three quarters of teachers responded that at least 50% of course materials could be mastered by students on their own.

CONCLUSIONS:

Overall, the perceived effectiveness of e-learning among students and teachers has not changed significantly over time. Nor have students' preferences shifted significantly for various learning modes after the in-person learning resumed. However, informative directional trends have emerged. Our research illustrates empirically the need to corroborate students' and instructors' experiences over time to inform more holistic improvements of e-learning.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Computer-Assisted Instruction / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Educ Journal subject: Education Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12909-022-03383-x

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Computer-Assisted Instruction / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Med Educ Journal subject: Education Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12909-022-03383-x