Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Yarimada, Semir; Barut Selver, Özlem; Palamar, Melis.
  • Yarimada S; Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey
  • Barut Selver Ö; Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey
  • Palamar M; Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir, Turkey
Turk J Ophthalmol ; 52(2): 86-90, 2022 04 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1818500
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate changes in the clinical findings of keratoplasty patients who could not be examined face-to-face and were followed up by telephone during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Materials and

Methods:

Patients with penetrating keratoplasty who presented to the cornea department between March 2020 and February 2021 were grouped according to whether they showed clinical deterioration (Group 1 no deterioration, Group 2 deterioration). The patients' last visit prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and their first visit after the pandemic-related lockdown ended were evaluated. The demographic data, follow-up period, and ophthalmological examination findings of all patients were recorded and the data were compared between the groups.

Results:

Thirty-five eyes of 35 patients were included in the study. Signs of deterioration were detected in 8 (22.8%) of the patients (Group 1), while no deterioration was detected in 27 (77.2%) of the patients (Group 2). In the last follow-up visit prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.26±0.43 LogMAR (range 0.52-1.80) in Group 1 and 1.41±1.02 LogMAR (range 0-3.1) in Group 2 (p=0.692). Mean BCVA in the first control during the pandemic was 2.07±0.86 LogMAR (range 1.3-3.1) in Group 1 and 1.49±1.08 LogMAR (range 0-3.1) in Group 2 (p=0.08). At the first visit during the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean intraocular pressure of Group 1 was 16.38±8.58 mmHg (range 0-31), and Group 2 was 17.11±3.7 mmHg (range 11-26) (p=0.984).

Conclusion:

The continuation of treatment initiated prior to the pandemic was probably the most important reason why deterioration was not observed in keratoplasty patients. In situations such as pandemics where face-to-face visits with patients may be disrupted, it may be possible to follow the patients safely with telemedicine visits until the difficult circumstances resolve.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Keratoplasty, Penetrating / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Turk J Ophthalmol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tjo.galenos.2022.22725

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Keratoplasty, Penetrating / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Turk J Ophthalmol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tjo.galenos.2022.22725