Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Analysis of patient outcomes after urological surgery during the second and third waves of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a high incidence area.
González-Díaz, A; Gil-Moradillo, J; Rosillo-Ramírez, N; Varela-Rodríguez, C; Rodríguez-Antolín, A; Tejido-Sánchez, Á.
  • González-Díaz A; Urology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute 12 de Octubre i+12 (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: alejandroglezdiaz@gmail.com.
  • Gil-Moradillo J; Urology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute 12 de Octubre i+12 (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
  • Rosillo-Ramírez N; Preventive Medicine Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute 12 de Octubre i+12 (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
  • Varela-Rodríguez C; Quality Healthcare Unit, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute 12 de Octubre i+12 (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
  • Rodríguez-Antolín A; Urology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute 12 de Octubre i+12 (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
  • Tejido-Sánchez Á; Urology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Research Institute 12 de Octubre i+12 (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 37(6): 382-389, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1819540
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze surgical safety through postoperative COVID-19 incidence and mortality at the urology department of a tertiary hospital located in Madrid (Spain).

METHODS:

Observational, prospective study including all patients undergoing urological surgery from 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2021. According to the hospital organization and local epidemiological situation we delimitate three epidemic waves. A set of screening and protective measures was applied from 4th May onwards. Demographic, baseline, surgical and perioperative variables, as well as postoperative outcomes, were collected. Telephone follow-up was performed at least 3 weeks after hospital discharge.

RESULTS:

940 urological surgeries were performed, 12 of them had to be rescheduled due to active or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection identified by the screening protocol. Thirty-one patients developed COVID-19 (3.3% incidence) and 7 died (22.6% mortality). The average time to onset of symptoms was 62.6 days after discharge, being 25 cases attributable to community transmission. The remaining 6 cases, due to in-hospital transmission, had worse outcomes. Five of them were identified during the first wave, especially when no preoperative PCR was obtained. In contrast, during the second and third waves, fewer and milder cases were diagnosed, with just 1 in-hospital transmission among 857 urological patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

After implementing complete protective measures, postoperative in-hospital COVID-19 cases almost disappeared, even during the second and third waves. Most of the cases were due to community transmission and thus driven by the general epidemiological situation. While hospitals follow recommendations to avoid COVID-19 infection, urological surgery remains safe and can be maintained.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Healthc Qual Res Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Healthc Qual Res Year: 2022 Document Type: Article