Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A Systematic Review of Physical Examination Components Adapted for Telemedicine.
Lu, Amy D; Veet, Clark A; Aljundi, Omar; Whitaker, Evans; Smith Ii, William B; Smith, Janeen E.
  • Lu AD; Division of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • Veet CA; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Aljundi O; Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Whitaker E; Palo Alto Medical Foundation Medical Group, San Carlos, California, USA.
  • Smith Ii WB; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Smith JE; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.
Telemed J E Health ; 2022 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1819772
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in a rapid, transformative adoption of telemedicine to maintain patient access to care. As clinicians made the shift from in-person to virtual practice, they faced a paucity of established and reliable clinical examination standards for virtual care settings. In this systematic review, we summarize the accuracy and reliability of virtual assessments compared with traditional in-person examination tools.

Methods:

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception through September 2019 and included additional studies from handsearching of reference lists. We included studies that compared synchronous video (except allowing for audio-only modality for cardiopulmonary exams) with in-person clinical assessments of patients in various settings. We excluded behavioral health and dermatological assessments. Two investigators abstracted data using a predefined protocol.

Results:

A total of 64 studies were included and categorized into 5 clinical domains neurological (N = 41), HEENT (head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat; N = 5), cardiopulmonary (N = 5), musculoskeletal (N = 8), and assessment of critically ill patients (N = 5). The cognitive assessment within the neurological exam was by far the most studied (N = 19) with the Mini-Mental Status Exam found to be highly reliable in multiple settings. Most studies showed relatively good reliability of the virtual assessment, although sample sizes were often small (<50 participants).

Conclusions:

Overall, virtual assessments performed similarly to in-person exam components for diagnostic accuracy but had a wide range of interrater reliability. The high heterogeneity in population, setting, and outcomes reported across studies render it difficult to draw broad conclusions on the most effective exam components to adopt into clinical practice. Further work is needed to identify virtual exam components that improve diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2021.0602

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2021.0602