Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Remote COVID-19 patient monitoring system: a qualitative evaluation.
Oliver, Jane; Dutch, Martin; Rojek, Amanda; Putland, Mark; Knott, Jonathan C.
  • Oliver J; The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia jane.oliver@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Dutch M; Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia.
  • Rojek A; Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
  • Putland M; Emergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia.
  • Knott JC; Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e054601, 2022 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1891819
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many COVID-19 patients are discharged home from hospital with instructions to self-isolate. This reduces the burden on potentially overwhelmed hospitals. The Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) Home Monitoring Programme (HMP) is a model of care for COVID-19 patients which chiefly tracks pulse oximetry and body temperature readings.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the HMP from a patient perspective. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Of 46 COVID-19 patients who used the HMP through RMH during April to August 2020, 16 were invited to participate in this qualitative evaluation study; all accepted, including 6 healthcare workers. Attempts were made to recruit a gender-balanced sample across a range of COVID-19 severities and comorbidities. Participants completed a brief semistructured phone interview discussing their experience of using the HMP. OUTCOME MEASURES AND

ANALYSIS:

A thematic analysis of interview data was conducted. Feasibility was defined as the HMP's reported ease of use. Acceptability was considered holistically by reviewing themes in the interview data.

RESULTS:

The HMP allowed clinical deterioration to be recognised as it occurred enabling prompt intervention. All participants reported a positive opinion of the HMP, stating it was highly acceptable and easy to use. Almost all participants said they found using it reassuring. Patients frequently mentioned the importance of the monitoring clinicians as an information conduit. The most suggested improvement was to monitor a broader set of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS:

The HMP is highly feasible and acceptable to patients. This model of care could potentially be implemented on a mass-scale to reduce the burden of COVID-19 on hospitals. A key benefit of the HMP is the ability to reassure patients they will receive suitable intervention should they deteriorate while isolating outside of hospital settings.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-054601

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-054601