Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Survey to identify research priorities for primary care in Scotland during and following the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hubbard, Gill; Grist, Fiona; Pope, Lindsey Margaret; Cunningham, Scott; Maxwell, Margaret; Bennie, Marion; Guthrie, Bruce; Mercer, Stewart W.
  • Hubbard G; Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK gill.hubbard@uhi.ac.uk.
  • Grist F; Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK.
  • Pope LM; School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Cunningham S; School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Maxwell M; Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Bennie M; Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
  • Guthrie B; College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Mercer SW; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e056817, 2022 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1891828
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To identify research priorities for primary care in Scotland following the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN:

Modified James Lind Alliance methodology; respondents completed an online survey to make research suggestions and rank research themes in order of priority.

SETTING:

Scotland primary care.

PARTICIPANTS:

Healthcare professionals in primary care in Scotland and members of primary care patient and public involvement groups. 512 respondents provided research suggestions; 8% (n=40) did not work in health or social care; of those who did work, 68.8% worked in primary care, 16.3% community care, 11.7% secondary care, 4.5% third sector, 4.2% university (respondents could select multiple options). Of those respondents who identified as healthcare professionals, 33% were in nursing and midwifery professions, 25% were in allied health professions (of whom 45% were occupational therapists and 35% were physiotherapists), 20% were in the medical profession and 10% were in the pharmacy profession. MAIN

OUTCOMES:

Suggestions for research for primary care made by respondents were categorised into themes and subthemes by researchers and ranked in order of priority by respondents.

RESULTS:

There were 1274 research suggestions which were categorised under 12 themes and 30 subthemes. The following five themes received the most suggestions for research disease and illness (n=461 suggestions), access (n=202), workforce (n=164), multidisciplinary team (MDT; n=143) and integration (n=108). One hundred and three (20%) respondents to the survey participated in ranking the list of 12 themes in order of research priority. The five most highly ranked research priorities were disease and illness, health inequalities, access, workforce and MDTs. The disease and illness theme had the greatest number of suggestions for research and was scored the most highly in the ranking exercise. The subtheme ranked as the most important research priority in the disease and illness theme was 'mental health'.

CONCLUSIONS:

The themes and subthemes identified in this study should inform research funders so that the direction of primary healthcare is informed by evidence.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomedical Research / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-056817

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomedical Research / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-056817