Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Performance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Serological Diagnostic Tests and Antibody Kinetics in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.
Choi, Hyun-Woo; Jeon, Chae-Hyeon; Won, Eun Jeong; Kang, Seung-Ji; Lee, Seung Yeob; Kee, Seung-Jung.
  • Choi HW; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Bitgoeul Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
  • Jeon CH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
  • Won EJ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, South Korea.
  • Kang SJ; Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
  • Lee SY; Department of Infectious Diseases, Chonnam National University Bitgoeul Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
  • Kee SJ; Department of Infectious Diseases, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
Front Microbiol ; 13: 881038, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1822384
ABSTRACT
Serological testing is recommended to support the detection of undiagnosed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. However, the performance of serological assays has not been sufficiently evaluated. Hence, the performance of six severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binding antibody assays [three chemiluminescence (CLIAs) and three lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs)] and a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) was analyzed in a total of 988 serum samples comprising 389 COVID-19-positives and 599 COVID-19-negatives. The overall diagnostic sensitivities of CLIAs and LFIAs ranged from 54.2 to 56.6% and from 56.3 to 64.3%, respectively. The overall diagnostic specificities of CLIAs and LFIAs ranged from 98.2 to 99.8% and from 97.3 to 99.0%, respectively. In the symptomatic group (n = 321), the positivity rate increased by over 80% in all assays > 14 days after symptom onset. In the asymptomatic group (n = 68), the positivity rate increased by over 80% in all assays > 21 days after initial RT-PCR detection. In LFIAs, negatively interpreted trace bands accounted for the changes in test performance. Most false-positive results were weak or trace reactions and showed negative results in additional sVNT. For six binding antibody assays, the overall agreement percentages ranged from 91.0 to 97.8%. The median inhibition activity of sVNT was significantly higher in the symptomatic group than in the asymptomatic group (50.0% vs. 29.2%; p < 0.0001). The median times to seropositivity in the symptomatic group were 9.7 days for CLIA-IgG, 9.2 and 9.8 days for two CLIAs-Total (IgM + IgG), 7.7 days for LFIA-IgM, 9.2 days for LFIA-IgG, and 8.8 days for sVNT-IgG, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between the quantitative results of the four binding antibody assays and sVNT with Spearman ρ-values ranging from 0.746 to 0.854. In particular, when using LFIAs, we recommend using more objective interpretable assays or establishing a band interpretation system for each laboratory, accompanied by observer training. We also anticipate that sVNT will play an essential role in SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing and become the practical routine neutralizing antibody assay.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Front Microbiol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmicb.2022.881038

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Front Microbiol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmicb.2022.881038