Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Clinician and Patient Experience of Internet-Mediated Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing Therapy.
Bursnall, Matthew; Thomas, Benjamin D; Berntsson, Hannah; Strong, Emily; Brayne, Mark; Hind, Daniel.
  • Bursnall M; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
  • Thomas BD; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
  • Berntsson H; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
  • Strong E; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield. Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK.
  • Brayne M; 1a Havelock Road, Sheringham, NR26 8QD UK.
  • Hind D; 1a Havelock Road, Sheringham, NR26 8QD UK.
J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health ; 9(3): 251-262, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1827536
ABSTRACT
Many eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapists moved their practice online during COVID-19. We conducted surveys and interviews to understand the implementation and acceptability of online EMDR therapy. From 17 June to 2nd August 2021 an online survey was open to EMDR therapists from the EMDR Association UK & Ireland and EMDR International Association email lists, and, through them, their clients. Questions related to determinants of implementation (for therapists) and acceptability (for clients) of online EMDR. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of therapist respondents to provide a deeper understanding of survey responses. Survey responses were received from therapists (n = 562) from five continents, and their clients (n = 148). 88% of clients responded as being extremely or very comfortable receiving EMDR therapy online. At the initial point of 'social distancing', 54% of therapists indicated strong or partial reluctance to deliver online EMDR therapy compared to 11% just over one year later. Four fifths of therapists intended to continue offering online therapy after restrictions were lifted. Free-text responses and interview data showed that deprivation and clinical severity could lead to exclusion from online EMDR. Internet connectivity could disrupt sessions, lead to cancellations, or affect the therapy process. Therapists benefited from training in online working. Online EMDR is generally acceptable to therapists and clients, with reservations about digital exclusion, case severity, poor internet connectivity and the need for training. Further research is needed to confirm that online EMDR is clinically non-inferior to in-person working. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40737-022-00260-0.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article