Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A prospective clinical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test using anterior nasal samples.
Akashi, Yusaku; Horie, Michiko; Takeuchi, Yuto; Togashi, Kenichi; Adachi, Yuki; Ueda, Atsuo; Notake, Shigeyuki; Nakamura, Koji; Terada, Norihiko; Kurihara, Yoko; Kiyasu, Yoshihiko; Suzuki, Hiromichi.
  • Akashi Y; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan; Akashi Internal Medicine Clinic, 3-1-63 Asahigaoka, Kashiwara, Osaka, 582-0026, Japan. Electronic address: yusaku-akashi@umin.ac.jp.
  • Horie M; Roche Diagnostics K.K, Medical, Quality & Regulatory, Shinagawa Season Terrace 1-2-70, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan. Electronic address: michiko.horie@roche.com.
  • Takeuchi Y; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan. Electronic address: yuto-takeuchi@umin.ac.jp
  • Togashi K; Roche Diagnostics K.K, Medical, Quality & Regulatory, Shinagawa Season Terrace 1-2-70, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan. Electronic address: togashi@roche.com.
  • Adachi Y; Roche Diagnostics K.K, Technical Support, Customer Solution, Shinagawa Season Terrace 1-2-70, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan. Electronic address: yuki.adachi@roche.com.
  • Ueda A; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan. Electronic address: atsuo.ueda06090727@outlook.jp.
  • Notake S; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan. Electronic address: notake@tmch.or.jp.
  • Nakamura K; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8558, Japan. Electronic address: koji-nakamura@tmch.or.jp.
  • Terada N; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan. Electronic address: terada.norihiko.ck@ms.hosp.tsukuba.ac.jp.
  • Kurihara Y; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan. Electronic address: kurihara.yoko.fu@un.tsukuba.ac.jp.
  • Kiyasu Y; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan. Electronic address: kiyasu-tuk@umin.ac.jp.
  • Suzuki H; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Tsukuba Hospital, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan; Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan. Electronic address: hsuzuki@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(6): 780-785, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1828867
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The diagnostic accuracy of antigen testing of anterior nasal (AN) samples for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has not been evaluated in the Japanese population. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (rapid antigen test) using AN samples.

METHODS:

Two AN samples and one nasopharyngeal (NP) sample were collected from individuals undergoing screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results of the rapid antigen test and the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test using AN samples were compared to those of RT-PCR tests using NP samples.

RESULTS:

Samples were collected from 800 participants, 95 and 110 of whom tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR tests of AN and NP samples, respectively. The overall sensitivity/specificity of the AN rapid antigen test and AN RT-PCR were 72.7%/100% and 86.4%/100%, respectively. In symptomatic cases, the sensitivities of the AN rapid antigen test and AN RT-PCR were 84.7% and 94.9%, respectively. In asymptomatic cases, the sensitivities of the AN rapid antigen test and AN RT-PCR were 58.8% and 76.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of the AN rapid antigen test was over 80% in cases with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25; it significantly decreased with an increase in the Ct values (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

The rapid antigen test with AN samples had a favorable sensitivity, especially in symptomatic cases or in cases with Ct values < 25. It gave no false-positive results. Compared with AN-RT PCR, the AN rapid antigen test had a modestly lower sensitivity in asymptomatic cases.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Infect Chemother Journal subject: Microbiology / Drug Therapy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Infect Chemother Journal subject: Microbiology / Drug Therapy Year: 2022 Document Type: Article