Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of a home sleep test with in-laboratory polysomnography in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
Hung, Chuan-Jen; Kang, Bor-Hwang; Lin, Yaoh-Shiang; Su, Hsing-Hao.
  • Hung CJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Kang BH; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Lin YS; School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
  • Su HH; Department of Otolaryngology-Head, and Neck Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
J Chin Med Assoc ; 85(7): 788-792, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1831459
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In-laboratory, polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). However, the long waiting list and sleeping at a hospital make patients hesitate to undergo the examination, thereby delaying diagnosis. During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, sleep labs are almost closed, and the delay is worsening. The home sleep test (HST) enables subjects to be tested at home, a familiar and comfortable environment, without a long waiting list. This study assessed the accuracy of a type III HST in diagnosing OSAS in the Taiwanese population and identified factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS:

This retrospective study included 67 patients with clinically suspected OSAS. All patients were allocated to receive both PSG and the HST. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) measured through PSG was used as the standard. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the HST in diagnosing and evaluating the severity of OSAS were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Among the 67 patients, no significant difference was noted in the average AHI values obtained using PSG and the HST ( p = 0.103). The AHI obtained from HST was significantly correlated with that obtained from PSG, with the correlation coefficient being 0.779 ( p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the HST in diagnosing OSAS were 94.9%, 62.5%, and 91.0%, respectively, and 80.0%, 74.1%, and 77.6% in diagnosing moderate to severe OSAS. Furthermore, the difference in AHIs measured using the two tests were positively correlated with the severity of sleep apnea.

CONCLUSION:

The HST used in preliminary screening of patients with suspected OSAS achieved an accuracy of >90%. For patients with moderate to severe OSAS, the accuracy was below 80%. Therefore, for patients who receive an OSAS diagnosis through the HST, arrangement of PSG is recommended for determining the severity of the OSAS and giving proper treatment.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sleep Apnea, Obstructive / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Chin Med Assoc Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Sleep Apnea, Obstructive / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Chin Med Assoc Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article