Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Application and Patient-Reported Experience of Telephone Consultations in Elective Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgery: 12-Month Follow-up.
Sharma, Aman; Howgate, Daniel; Loizou, Constantinos; Rogers, Mark; Sharp, Robert; Kendal, Adrian; Brown, Rick.
  • Sharma A; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Howgate D; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Loizou C; Botnar Research Centre, The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Rogers M; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Sharp R; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Kendal A; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Brown R; Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Foot Ankle Int ; 43(5): 694-702, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1833056
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Telemedicine offers convenient and affordable health care, overcoming the logistical challenges of face-to-face encounters. Clinicians increasingly relied on telemedicine during the global pandemic. To assess the ongoing role for telemedicine in orthopaedics, we prospectively analyzed the failure rate, safety and patient-reported experience of telephone consultations for 12 months.

METHODS:

265 telephone Foot/Ankle consultations were conducted in April 2020 and were prospectively analyzed over 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the rate of failed telephone consultations. A consultation was deemed unacceptable if the patient did not answer, if the clinician could not reach a conclusion or if any outcome changed over 12 months. Secondary outcome measures included patient-reported satisfaction and time saved by avoiding a face-to-face visit.

RESULTS:

A clinical decision was reached in 84% of follow-up telephone consultations and 64% of new patient consultations (P = 0.001). Sixty-six percent were managed with nonoperative therapies, 16% were discharged, and 11% were added to the waiting list for surgery. The reasons for failing to achieve a clinical decision included failure to contact the patient (12.8%), inappropriate discharge with subsequent rereferral (1.9%), and insufficient clinical information (1.5%). Overall, 84.7% of patients reported that the telephone consultation was highly useful and 71.9% would recommend it to a friend or family member. Patients reported a mean time saving of 120 minutes.

CONCLUSION:

Based on our experience, we provide recommended criteria for the safe and practical use of telephone consultations and suggest versatile patient care pathways into which a telephone consultation can be incorporated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, prospective cohort series (noncomparative).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Orthopedic Procedures / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Foot Ankle Int Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 10711007211068478

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / Orthopedic Procedures / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Foot Ankle Int Journal subject: Orthopedics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 10711007211068478