Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Ophthalmology practice in COVID-19 pandemic: Performance of rapid antigen test versus real time-reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in a tertiary eye care institute in South India.
Sarkar, Sandip; Deb, Amit Kumar; Singh, Rakesh; Dhodapakar, Rahul; Gokhale, Tanmay; Kaliaperumal, Subashini.
  • Sarkar S; Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
  • Deb AK; Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
  • Singh R; Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
  • Dhodapakar R; Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
  • Gokhale T; Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
  • Kaliaperumal S; Department of Ophthalmology, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(5): 1761-1765, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1835130
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To assess the rapid antigen test (RAT) against the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to screen COVID-19 infection in asymptomatic patients undergoing ophthalmic procedures.

Methods:

This was a retrospective hospital-based study. Point-of-care (PoC) RAT was performed using nasopharyngeal swab, while RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was performed using both nasopharyngeal and throat swabs.

Results:

A total of 629 patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by using both RAT and RT-PCR. Only one patient had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with both RAT and RT-PCR, while two patients had tested positive with RT-PCR after an initial negative RAT. The positivity rate for RAT was 0.15% (1/629), and that for RT-PCR was 0.47%. Percent agreement or proportion of agreement observed between the two tests was 99.68%, while Cohen's kappa coefficient value was 0.49. The sensitivity of RAT in comparison to RT-PCR was 33.33%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 99.68%.

Conclusion:

The sensitivity and Cohen's kappa coefficient in our study were low but that can be attributed to the overall low positivity rates with both RAT and RT-PCR. However, percent agreement observed between the two tests was very high. Therefore, we recommend initial screening of all the patients for COVID-19 symptoms followed by RAT before performing any ophthalmic surgical procedure to ensure the safety of the health care professionals as well as the patients.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijo.IJO_21_22

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijo.IJO_21_22