Your browser doesn't support javascript.
A ensemble methodology for automatic classification of chest X-rays using deep learning.
Vogado, Luis; Araújo, Flávio; Neto, Pedro Santos; Almeida, João; Tavares, João Manuel R S; Veras, Rodrigo.
  • Vogado L; Departamento de Computação, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil. Electronic address: lhvogado@gmail.com.
  • Araújo F; Curso de Bacharelado em Sistemas de Informação, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Picos, Brazil. Electronic address: flavio86@ufpi.edu.br.
  • Neto PS; Departamento de Computação, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil. Electronic address: pasn@ufpi.edu.br.
  • Almeida J; Departamento de Informática, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil. Electronic address: jdallyson@nca.ufma.br.
  • Tavares JMRS; Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: tavares@fe.up.pt.
  • Veras R; Departamento de Computação, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, Brazil. Electronic address: rveras@ufpi.edu.br.
Comput Biol Med ; 145: 105442, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1838691
ABSTRACT
Chest radiographies, or chest X-rays, are the most standard imaging exams used in daily hospitals. Responsible for assisting in detecting numerous pathologies and findings that directly interfere in the patient's life, this exam is therefore crucial in screening patients. This work proposes a methodology based on a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) ensemble to aid the diagnosis of chest X-ray exams by screening them with a high probability of being normal or abnormal. In the development of this study, a private dataset with frontal and lateral projections X-ray images was used. To build the ensemble model, VGG-16, ResNet50 and DenseNet121 architectures, which are commonly used in the classification of Chest X-rays, were evaluated. A Confidence Threshold (CTR) was used to define the predictions into High Confidence Normal (HCn), Borderline classification (BC), or High Confidence Abnormal (HCa). In the tests performed, very promising results were achieved 54.63% of the exams were classified with high confidence; of the normal exams, 32% were classified as HCn with an false discovery rate (FDR) of 1.68%; and as to the abnormal exams, 23% were classified as HCa with 4.91% false omission rate (FOR).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Deep Learning Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Comput Biol Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Deep Learning Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Comput Biol Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article