Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Gearing Up for a Vaccine Requirement: A Mixed Methods Study of COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence Among Workers at an Academic Medical Center.
Mahoney, Megan; Winget, Marcy; Brown-Johnson, Cati; de Borba, Lindsay; Veruttipong, Darlene; Luu, Jacklyn; Jones, David; Bohman, Bryan; Vilendrer, Stacie.
  • Mahoney M; Stanford University, Department of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, and Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto.
  • Brown-Johnson C; Stanford University, Department of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • de Borba L; Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California.
  • Veruttipong D; Stanford University, Department of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Luu J; Stanford School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Palo Alto, California.
  • Jones D; Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California.
  • Bohman B; Stanford University, Department of Medicine and Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, California.
  • Vilendrer S; Stanford University, Department of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
J Healthc Manag ; 67(3): 206-220, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1840100
ABSTRACT
GOAL Assessing barriers to vaccination among healthcare workers may be particularly important given their roles in their respective communities. We conducted a mixed methods study to explore healthcare worker perspectives on receiving COVID-19 vaccines at a large multisite academic medical center.

METHODS:

A total of 5,917 employees completed the COVID-19 vaccine confidence survey (20% response rate). Most participants were vaccinated (93%). Compared to vaccinated participants, unvaccinated participants were younger (60% < 44 years), more likely to be from a non-Asian minority group (48%), and more likely to be nonclinical employees (57% vs. 46%). Among the unvaccinated respondents, 53% indicated they would be influenced by their healthcare provider, while 19% reported that nothing would influence them to get vaccinated. Key perceived barriers to vaccination from the qualitative analysis included the need for more long-term safety and efficacy data, a belief in the right to make an individual choice, mistrust, a desire for greater public health information, personal health concerns, circumstances such as prior COVID-19 infection, and access issues. PRINCIPAL

FINDINGS:

Strategies endorsed by some participants to address their concerns about safety and access included a communication campaign, personalized medicine approaches (e.g., individual appointments to discuss how the vaccine might interact with personal health conditions), and days off to recover. Mistrust and a belief in the right to make an individual choice may be harder barriers to overcome; further dialogue is needed. APPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE These findings reflect potential strategies for vaccine requirements that healthcare organizations can implement to enhance vaccine confidence. In addition, organizations can ask respected health professionals to serve as spokespeople, which may help shift the perspectives of unvaccinated healthcare workers.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Healthc Manag Journal subject: Hospitals / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Qualitative research Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Healthc Manag Journal subject: Hospitals / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article