Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Patients' expectations of preventive measures of medical institutions during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany in women with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional, web-based survey.
Schwab, Roxana; Droste, Annika; Stewen, Kathrin; Brenner, Walburgis; Schmidt, Marcus; Hasenburg, Annette.
  • Schwab R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany roxana.schwab@unimedizin-mainz.de.
  • Droste A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Stewen K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Brenner W; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Schmidt M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Hasenburg A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johannes Gutenberg University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e060038, 2022 05 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1840581
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To identify patient-approved contingency measures for protection of patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) from COVID-19 infection and to use these findings to improve staff's preparedness to cope with the course of this pandemic or similar situations. METHODS DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS,

INTERVENTIONS:

We conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of women with an increased risk of breast or ovarian cancer, regardless of whether they had experienced an active malignant disease during the pandemic. A self-reported questionnaire, developed for this study, was used to assess expectations and opinions about preventive measures within medical institutions.

RESULTS:

Sixty-four (71.9%) of the 89 potential participants responded to at least one question regarding contingency measures within medical institutions. Approximately 37% of the respondents preferred having information about their facility's hygiene protocols before appointment; 57.8% of the respondents endorsed regular SARS-CoV-2 testing of patients prior to medical appointments and 95.3% endorsed regular testing of HCWs. Additionally, 84.4% of the respondents supported HCWs' use of surgical masks and 68.8% supported HCWs' use of masks with greater protection. Notably, 75.0% of the respondents advocated for the presence of a significant other during medical consultations; 71.9% approved the use of telemedicine and 93.8% endorsed changes in appointment practices to enable social distancing. No significant associations were found between respondents' sociodemographic, disease-specific or pandemic-specific factors and their opinions on hygiene precautions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients at high risk of infection or severe course of COVID-19 approve strict contingency measures designed to lower the transmission of COVID-19 in medical facilities. Moreover, vulnerable groups may profit from contingency plans in healthcare facilities in order to follow preventive measures, avoid diagnostic delay or avoid worsening of pre-existing conditions. However, they also value the presence of a significant other during medical consultations and procedures.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-060038

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Neoplasms / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-060038