Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Clinical Utility of Surgical Lung Biopsy for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Hashimoto, Hiroyuki; Yamamoto, Shota; Nakagawa, Hiroaki; Suido, Yoshihiro; Sato, Shintaro; Tabata, Erina; Okamori, Satoshi; Yoshida, Takuo; Ando, Koichi; Yoshitake, Shigenori; Okada, Yohei.
  • Hashimoto H; Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Yamamoto S; Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Nakagawa H; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
  • Suido Y; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Asao General Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
  • Sato S; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
  • Tabata E; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Okamori S; Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yoshida T; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ando K; Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yoshitake S; Department of Health Science, Kyushu University of Health and Welfare, Miyazaki, Japan.
  • Okada Y; Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Respiration ; 101(4): 422-432, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1840677
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is performed in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, its clinical utility remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES:

We categorized the pathological diagnoses and investigated the predictive value for short-term mortality.

METHOD:

Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for the included studies. The QUADAS-2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias and its applicability. The types and populations of pathological diagnoses were investigated. The pooled sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were estimated at a fixed specificity. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn.

RESULTS:

A total of 16 studies that enrolled 758 patients were included. The pathological diagnoses were as follows diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) 29.9%; infection 24.7%; interstitial lung disease 17.2%; malignancy 3.6%; cardiovascular disease 3.6%; drug toxicity 2.3%; connective tissue disease 2.2%; allergic disease 1.1%; and nonspecific diagnosis 15.4%. To predict short-term mortality, 13 studies that enrolled 613 patients used DAD as an index test and recorded a mortality rate of 56.9% (349 of 613 patients). A total of 3 studies that used index tests other than DAD were excluded. The pooled sensitivity, fixed specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR were 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.56), 0.69, 1.48 (95% CI 0.92-1.81), 0.78 (95% CI 0.63-1.03), and 1.90 (95% CI 0.89-2.86), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

SLB is unlikely to provide a specific diagnosis and should not be recommended for confirming DAD or predicting ARDS prognosis.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Respiration Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 000519675

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Respiration Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 000519675