Your browser doesn't support javascript.
United Kingdom: Health System Review.
Anderson, Michael; Pitchforth, Emma; Edwards, Nigel; Alderwick, Hugh; McGuire, Alistair; Mossialos, Elias.
  • Anderson M; London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Pitchforth E; University of Exeter.
  • Edwards N; Nuffield Trust.
  • Alderwick H; The Health Foundation.
  • McGuire A; London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Mossialos E; London School of Economics and Political Science.
Health Syst Transit ; 24(1): 1-194, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1842621
ABSTRACT
This analysis provides a review of developments in financing, governance, organisation and delivery, health reforms and performance of the health systems in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom has enjoyed a national health service with access based on clinical need, and not ability to pay for over 70 years. This has provided several important benefits including protection against the financial consequences of ill-health, redistribution of wealth from rich to poor, and relatively low administrative costs. Despite this, the United Kingdom continues to lag behind many other comparable high-income countries in key measures including life expectancy, infant mortality and cancer survival. Total health spending in the United Kingdom is slightly above the average for Europe, but it is below many other comparable high-income countries such as Germany, France and Canada. The United Kingdom also has relatively lower levels of doctors, nurses, hospital beds and equipment than many other comparable high-income countries. Wider social determinants of health also contribute to poor outcomes, and the United Kingdom has one of the highest levels of income inequality in Europe. Devolution of responsibility for health care services since the late 1990s to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland has resulted in divergence in policies between countries, including in prescription charges, and eligibility for publicly funded social care services. However, more commonalities than differences remain between these health care systems. The United Kingdom initially experienced one of the highest death rates associated with COVID-19; however, the success and speed of the United Kingdom's vaccination programme has since improved the United Kingdom's performance in this respect. Principal health reforms in each country are focusing on facilitating cross-sectoral partnerships and promoting integration of services in a manner that improves the health and well-being of local populations. These include the establishment of integrated care systems in England, integrated joint boards in Scotland, regional partnership boards in Wales and integrated partnership boards in Northern Ireland. Policies are also being developed to align the social care funding model closer to the National Health Service funding model. These include a cap on costs over an individual's lifetime in England, and a national care service free at the point of need in Scotland and Wales. Currently, and for the future, significant investment is needed to address major challenges including a growing backlog of elective care, and staffing shortfalls exacerbated by Brexit.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: State Medicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Health Syst Transit Journal subject: Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Search on Google
Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: State Medicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Health Syst Transit Journal subject: Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article