Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Field Evaluation of the New Rapid NG-Test® SARS-CoV-2 Ag for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in the Emergency Department of an Academic Referral Hospital.
Avgoulea, Kalliopi; Beredaki, Maria-Ioanna; Vourli, Sophia; Siopi, Maria; Siafakas, Nikolaos; Pournaras, Spyros.
  • Avgoulea K; Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Beredaki MI; Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Vourli S; Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Siopi M; Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Siafakas N; Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Pournaras S; Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Front Public Health ; 10: 840984, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1847237
ABSTRACT

Background:

As the COVID-19 pandemic resurges affecting large numbers of patients, rapid, and accurate diagnosis using point-of-care tests is very important.

Objectives:

To evaluate the NG-Test® SARS-CoV-2 Ag (NG-Test) immunoassay for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) samples compared with RT-PCR, in patients attending the Emergencies of an academic referral hospital.

Methods:

All adult ambulatory patients presenting to the Emergencies of "Attikon" University hospital (Athens, Greece) within three consecutive hours per day between December 2020 and March 2021 and for whom SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing was requested were included. Two NP and one OP samples obtained from each participant were analyzed to determine the diagnostic performance [sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV)] of the NG-Test (NP/OP swabs) in comparison to the reference RT-PCR (NP swab).

Results:

Overall, 134/263 (51%) patients tested were RT-PCR positive, whereof 108 (overall sensitivity 81%, 95% CI 73-87%) were NP NG-Test positive (PPV 99%, NPV 83%) and 68 (overall sensitivity 51%, 95% CI 42-59%) were OP NG-Test positive (PPV 100%, NPV 66%). The test's specificity (95% CI) was 99% (95-100%) and 100% (96-100%) for NP and OP swabs, respectively. The assay's sensitivity (95% CI) for high viral load (Ct ≤25) was 99% (92-100%) and 71% (60-81%) for NP and OP swabs, respectively.

Conclusions:

NG-Test using NP swabs detected almost all patients with high viral loads, showing satisfactory performance as a point-of-care test for NP samples obtained from patients with acute infection.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpubh.2022.840984

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Front Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fpubh.2022.840984