Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Performance Evaluation of a Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) during Omicron Pandemic Wave in Greece, Conducted by Different Personnel, and Comparison with Performance in Previous Wave (Alpha Variant) Period.
Kyritsi, Maria A; Speletas, Matthaios; Mouchtouri, Varvara; Vachtsioli, Evangelia; Babalis, Dimitrios; Kouliou, Olympia; Tsispara, Anastasia; Tseroni, Maria; Hadjichristodoulou, Christos.
  • Kyritsi MA; Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
  • Speletas M; Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.
  • Mouchtouri V; Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
  • Vachtsioli E; Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
  • Babalis D; Emergency Department, General Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece.
  • Kouliou O; Emergency Department, General Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece.
  • Tsispara A; Emergency Department, General Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece.
  • Tseroni M; Directorate of Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases, National Public Health Organization, 15123 Athens, Greece.
  • Hadjichristodoulou C; Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(5)2022 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1847278
ABSTRACT
Due to the prevailing ambiguity regarding the performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) for B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant diagnosis, a commercial RAT was evaluated in the emergency ward of a general hospital in Larissa, Central Greece. The sampling and the evaluation were repeated twice by different personnel. Discordance between the two samplings was observed regarding the sensitivity (47.5%, 95% CI 39.0-56.1 vs. 78.6%, 95% CI 69.1-86.2) and specificity (93.8%, 95% CI 86.0-97.9 vs. 100.0%, 95% CI 93.3-100.0) of the RAT. Furthermore, the test displayed slightly lower sensitivity (78.6% vs. 85.5%, 95% CI 79.1-90.5) compared to its initial evaluation that was conducted by our team when the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant was dominant.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Topics: Variants Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Diagnostics12051048

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies Topics: Variants Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Diagnostics12051048