Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Experiences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic amongst Australian healthcare workers: from stressors to protective factors.
Broom, J; Williams Veazey, L; Broom, A; Hor, S; Degeling, C; Burns, P; Wyer, M; Gilbert, G L.
  • Broom J; Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: jennifer.broom@health.qld.gov.au.
  • Williams Veazey L; Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Broom A; Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Hor S; Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Degeling C; Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Burns P; ANU Medical School, Hospital Road, Garran ACT, 2605, Australia; School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Wyer M; The Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gilbert GL; The Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
J Hosp Infect ; 121: 75-81, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1851508
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has critically challenged healthcare systems globally. Examining the experiences of healthcare workers (HCWs) is important for optimizing ongoing and future pandemic responses.

OBJECTIVES:

In-depth exploration of Australian HCWs' experiences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with a focus on reported stressors vis-à-vis protective factors.

METHODS:

Individual interviews were performed with 63 HCWs in Australia. A range of professional streams and operational staff were included. Thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

Thematic analysis identified stressors centred on paucity of, or changing, evidence, leading to absence of, or mistrust in, guidelines; unprecedented alterations to the autonomy and sense of control of clinicians; and deficiencies in communication and support. Key protective factors included the development of clear guidance from respected clinical leaders or recognized clinical bodies, interpersonal support, and strong teamwork, leadership, and a sense of organizational preparedness.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides insights into the key organizational sources of emotional stress for HCWs within pandemic responses and describes experiences of protective factors. HCWs experiencing unprecedented uncertainty, fear, and rapid change, rely on clear communication, strong leadership, guidelines endorsed by recognized expert groups or individuals, and have increased reliance on interpersonal support. Structured strategies for leadership and communication at team, service group and organizational levels, provision of psychological support, and consideration of the potential negative effects of centralizing control, would assist in ameliorating the extreme pressures of working within a pandemic environment.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Protective Factors / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Personnel / Protective Factors / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2022 Document Type: Article