Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Protective equipment-related pressure ulcers in healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.
Tezcan, Bilge; Eraydin, Canan; Karabacak, Bilgi Gülseven.
  • Tezcan B; Marmara University, Institute of Health Science, Nursing Department, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: bilgesaracoglu11@gmail.com.
  • Eraydin C; Marmara University, Institute of Health Science, Nursing Department, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: eraydincanan@gmail.com.
  • Karabacak BG; Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing Fundamentals, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: bgulseven@marmara.edu.tr.
J Tissue Viability ; 31(2): 213-220, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1851676
ABSTRACT

AIM:

This systematic review was carried out to examine pressure ulcers in healthcare staff due to the use of protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic and the precautions taken to prevent these injuries.

METHOD:

Relevant studies were retrospectively searched. Seven English keywords identified from MESH were used while searching. The search was carried out in five international databases by trying various combinations of these words during February 15-25, 2021. This systematic review was updated by rescanning databases on December 20, 2021 and a total of 611 studies were attained.

RESULTS:

17 studies which met the study inclusion criteria, which were conducted mostly through online survey method in different study designs and which included a total of 24,889 healthcare professionals were examined. The incidence of PPE-related pressure ulcers was found to be between 30% and 92.8%. Grade I pressure ulcers were the most common (44.1%-82%). The incidence of skin problems except PPE-related pressure ulcers such as itching, redness and dry skin was found to be between 42.8-88.1%. Risk factors that frequently played a role in the development of PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems were longer use of PPE and sweating. PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems were more frequent over the nose (nasal bone/nasal bridge), ears, forehead and cheeks. PPE-related itching, redness and dry skin mostly occurred. Several dressing applications were found to be effective in the prevention of PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems that might develop especially on the facial region.

CONCLUSION:

PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems were found to be higher among healthcare professionals. Data regarding the sealing of dressing applications against viral transmission in the prevention of PPE-related pressure ulcers and other skin problems are limited. It is estimated that future studies will be performed to prevent device-related pressure ulcers in healthcare workers. It is suggested that there is a need to conduct studies with larger samples where expert researchers make observations for pressure ulcers in order to determine the prevalence and incidence of PPE-related pressure ulcers.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pressure Ulcer / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Tissue Viability Journal subject: Nursing / Physiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pressure Ulcer / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Tissue Viability Journal subject: Nursing / Physiology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article