Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mental healthcare in primary and community-based settings: evidence beyond the WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide.
Keynejad, Roxanne C; Spagnolo, Jessica; Thornicroft, Graham.
  • Keynejad RC; Health Service and Population Research, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK Roxanne.1.keynejad@kcl.ac.uk.
  • Spagnolo J; Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
  • Thornicroft G; Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne, Campus de Longueuil, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Evid Based Ment Health ; 2022 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1854369
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The WHO's Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) has been widely used in low and middle-income countries. We reviewed literature describing interventions and training programmes beyond the mhGAP-IG, in primary healthcare (PHC) and community-based healthcare (CBH).

DESIGN:

We searched studies excluded from our updated mhGAP-IG systematic review, and included in other relevant systematic reviews, for evidence and experience of initiatives integrating mental health into PHC and CBH. Our 24 November 2020 mhGAP-IG search encompassed MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS, ScieELO, Cochrane, PubMed databases, 3ie and Google Scholar. Although heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis, we descriptively summarised the evidence-base.

RESULTS:

Out of 1827 results, we identified 208 relevant records. They described randomised controlled trials of mental health interventions (98 studies, n=55 523 participants), non-randomised studies measuring clinical outcomes (22 studies, n=7405), training outcomes (36 studies, n=12 280) and implementation outcomes (21 studies, n=1090), plus descriptive accounts (18 studies, n=2526), baseline surveys and exploratory studies (6 studies, n=17 093) and commentaries (7 studies). Most (40%) were conducted in the African region, region of the Americas (16%), and South-East Asia (13%). Randomised and non-randomised studies reported improved symptoms, substance use, functioning, parenting and child outcomes. Non-randomised studies reported improved clinical knowledge, confidence and skills following training.

CONCLUSIONS:

The literature beyond the mhGAP-IG is extensive and shares common findings. Future priorities are less-studied regions, interventions for severe mental illness, exploring ways that mhGAP-IG and alternative approaches complement each other in different contexts and scaling-up mental health integration.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017068459.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal subject: Psychology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ebmental-2021-300401

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal subject: Psychology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ebmental-2021-300401