Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Simulated and clinical aerosol spread in common periodontal aerosol-generating procedures.
Puljich, Anthony; Jiao, Kexin; Lee, Ryan S B; Walsh, Laurence J; Ivanovski, Saso; Han, Pingping.
  • Puljich A; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Jiao K; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Lee RSB; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Walsh LJ; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
  • Ivanovski S; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia. s.ivanovski@uq.edu.au.
  • Han P; The University of Queensland, School of Dentistry, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia. p.han@uq.edu.au.
Clin Oral Investig ; 26(9): 5751-5762, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1866634
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study evaluated particle spread associated with various common periodontal aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) in simulated and clinical settings. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A simulation study visualized the aerosols, droplets, and splatter spread with and without high-volume suction (HVS, 325 L/min) during common dental AGPs, namely ultrasonic scaling, air flow prophylaxis, and implant drilling after fluorescein dye was added to the water irrigant as a tracer. Each procedure was repeated 10 times. A complementary clinical study measured the spread of contaminated particles within the dental operatory and quantified airborne protein dispersion following 10 min of ultrasonic supragingival scaling of 19 participants during routine periodontal treatment.

RESULTS:

The simulation study data showed that air flow produced the highest amount of splatters and the ultrasonic scaler generated the most aerosol and droplet particles at 1.2 m away from the source. The use of HVS effectively reduced 37.5-96% of splatter generation for all three dental AGPs, as well as 82-93% of aerosol and droplet particles at 1.2 m for the ultrasonic scaler and air polisher. In the clinical study, higher protein levels above background levels following ultrasonic supragingival scaling were detected in fewer than 20% of patients, indicating minimal particle spread.

CONCLUSIONS:

While three common periodontal AGPs produce aerosols and droplet particles up to at least 1.2 m from the source, the use of HVS is of significant benefit. Routine ultrasonic supragingival scaling produced few detectable traces of salivary protein at various sites throughout the 10-min dental operatory. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The likelihood of aerosol spread to distant sites during common periodontal AGPs is greatly reduced by high-volume suction. Clinically, limited evidence of protein contaminants was found following routine ultrasonic scaling, suggesting that the the majority of the contamination consisits of the irrigant rather than organic matter from the oral cavity.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Scaling / Dental Care Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00784-022-04532-8

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Scaling / Dental Care Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Oral Investig Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00784-022-04532-8