Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on a regional Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery Service in the United Kingdom;A review of case-load prioritisation and lessons learned
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal ; 59(4 SUPPL):9, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1868937
ABSTRACT
Background/

Purpose:

Cleft Surgery in our centre is delivered by a single specialist surgeon in a regional Burns and Plastic service. We see 35-45 cleft-affected births per annum and, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, ran 6 theatre lists per month, conducting 170-180 cleft procedures annually. The pandemic severely hindered elective operating in even tertiary centres, due to the redeployment of theatre staff and resources to manage the emergency care load. Cleft surgery was suspended entirely during the first wave (March-June 2020), before efforts in collaboration with the RCPCH (UK) to conserve the cleft pathway restored it as a priority. Primary palatine reconstruction is recommended at 6-9 months of age to optimise velopharyngeal function and speech proficiency by 5 years (Slater et al 2019). Our service was restarted at 1-2 ad hoc lists a month, which was both insufficient to manage ongoing demands and deal with rising outstanding cases. We faced a major challenge in safely distributing scarce surgical time and capacity across the entire cleft surgical burden. Therefore, we aim to examine our response to these limitations in the face of rising cases and time pressures, illustrating our methods in prioritising cleft procedures. Methods/Description We reviewed the current literature to determine which of the main cleft procedures were most time critical, and compiled a cleft priority document with a broad evidence basis. Babies with palate involvement were top priority, in light of the strong evidence advocating primary palate repair by 13 months of age (CRANE 2020), after which there is a risk of speech delay (Shaffer et al 2020). Primary lip +/- alveolar involvement were prioritised lower and performed later (∼1 year), as cosmesis during infancy was deemed less detrimental, although there remained the psychological impact on the parent (Grollemund et al 2020). Secondary speech surgery was next, the lack of which can inhibit education and require intensive speech therapy to support patients (Baillie and Sell 2020). This was followed by alveolar bone grafting, ideally performed prior to canine eruption at ∼8-9 years to limit further dental reconstructions (Vandersluis et al 2020). As per national consensus, all adult cleft surgery was suspended to accommodate higher priorities. Focusing on early palate repair helped restart the cleft pathway and prevent functional delay as well as further interventions and schoolage support. However, late lip repair saw a rise in complications - two cases of dehiscence were associated with self-inflicted toddler trauma. This is in addition to the psychosocial implications of cosmesis, including early maternal interactions (Montirosso et al 2011), stigmatisation by peers (Bous et al 2021), and parental anxiety (Bous et al 2020). We recommend isolated lip reconstructions are also undertaken within 9 months. Long-term physical and psychosocial impacts of delay in surgery should guide resource allocation in the event of future operating limitations.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Type of study: Experimental Studies Language: English Journal: Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Year: 2022 Document Type: Article