Your browser doesn't support javascript.
South East of Scotland Cancer Network (SCAN) Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) Capacity and Future Modelling Tool
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice ; 28(2 SUPPL):32-33, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1868961
ABSTRACT

Background:

A review of SACT services across SCAN was undertaken from 2016-2108 with the aim of identifying sustainable service models to future proof personcentred, safe and effective care across the network.1 A key objective from the review was to identify a suitable tool which would measure resource capacity within day units and aid future planning. A review of literature identified no off-the-shelf tool therefore a regional group was set up to develop one, building on work completed in West Of Scotland Cancer Network (2018). All health boards and disciplines were represented. The SCAN SACT Capacity & Future Modelling Tool is the outcome of this work and was launched for use in 2020. Methodology • All SACT regimes delivered in day units / Out-patient departments across SCAN listed. • Inclusion of non-SACT supportive interventions. • Chair, nurse, clinical pharmacist and pharmacy isolator resource applied to each regime based on regional time and motion studies and national guidance. • Non-patient facing activities for service delivery identified for inclusion. • Capacity modifiers agreed and included for staff in training, leave, human factors. • Individual unit parameters applied e.g., opening hours, staffing, chairs. • Activity data drawn from local ChemoCare® system. • Regional and Board level validation. • Input from workforce planning analyst team to maximise functionality and usability. • Presented to Regional Workforce Planning Group and Scottish Oncology Pharmacy Group for external input and validation. • Development of a user manual, standard operating procedures and a business-as-usual process for maintenance and bi-annuals updates.

Discussion:

A beta testing phase was completed by January 2020 to validate formula, content of manual, activity reports and usability. COVID-19 caused a delay in launch, but the tool was updated to include new regimes and was rolled out in 2021. The tool can be customised for individual cancer units and is endorsed at regional executive level for • Monitoring the impact of activity on chair, aseptic and clinical pharmacy, and nursing resource. • Aiding individual units to model the impact of practice change, service redesign and new medicines. • Supporting the understanding of capacity across the region. Outputs from the tool have contributed to successful business cases for staff, chair resource and to explore the impact of new regimens for formulary applications. Next steps would be to expand the tool to include more trial regimens and explore potential for links with national work streams through interest generated to date.

Conclusion:

Clinical and management teams are embracing the tool for service planning, moving from a process which focused mainly on numbers and finance to one which interprets those numbers in terms of environmental and human resource. As the patient population we care for and therapies we deliver become more complex this enhancement to service planning supports both patient and professional safety.2.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Language: English Journal: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: Databases of international organizations Database: EMBASE Language: English Journal: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Year: 2022 Document Type: Article