Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Programmed multi-level ventilation in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multi-center retrospective observational study.
Depta, Filip; Török, Pavol; G Miller, Andrew; Firment, Peter; Leskanic, Jozef; Porubän, Adam; Halas, Pavol; Mandinec, Stanislav; Filka, Vladimír; Zajac, Henryk; Gentile, Michael A; Zdravkovic, Marko.
  • Depta F; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovakia.
  • Török P; Pavol Jozef Safárik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
  • G Miller A; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, East Slovak Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Slovakia.
  • Firment P; Pavol Jozef Safárik University, Kosice, Slovakia.
  • Leskanic J; Respiratory Care Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Porubän A; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, FN Hospital J. A. Reimana Presov, Slovakia.
  • Halas P; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sv. Jakuba Hospital, Bardejov, Slovakia.
  • Mandinec S; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Liptov Hospital, Liptovský Mikulás, Slovakia.
  • Filka V; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Myjava, Slovakia.
  • Zajac H; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty Hospital, Trencín, Slovakia.
  • Gentile MA; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, L. Pasteur University Hospital, Kosice, Slovakia.
  • Zdravkovic M; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, AGEL Hospital, Krompachy, Slovakia.
J Int Med Res ; 50(5): 3000605221101970, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1874963
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We evaluated pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with multiple programmed levels of positive end expiratory pressure (programmed multi-level ventilation; PMLV) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS:

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study from November 2020 to February 2021. PMLV was used with PCV in all patients with intensive care admission until improvement in oxygenation (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] ≤0.50 and oxygen saturation [SpO2] >92%). The observed outcomes were improvement of hypoxemia, length of mechanical ventilation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) stability, and adverse events.

RESULTS:

Of 188 mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, we analyzed 60 patients treated with PMLV. Hypoxemia improved in 55 (92%) patients, as measured by the change in partial pressure of oxygen/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 ratios on day 3 versus day 1, and in 32 (66%) ventilated patients on day 7 versus day 3. The median (interquartile range) length of mechanical ventilation for survivors and non-survivors was 8.4 (4.7-14.9) and 6.7 (3.6-10.3) days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

PMLV appears to be a safe and effective ventilation strategy for improving hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Further studies are needed comparing the PMLV mode with the conventional ARDS ventilatory approach.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Int Med Res Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 03000605221101970

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Int Med Res Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 03000605221101970