Your browser doesn't support javascript.
HbA1c and Glucose Management Indicator Discordance Associated with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in Intermittent Scanning Glucose Monitoring System.
Fellinger, Paul; Rodewald, Karin; Ferch, Moritz; Itariu, Bianca; Kautzky-Willer, Alexandra; Winhofer, Yvonne.
  • Fellinger P; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine III, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Rodewald K; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine III, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Ferch M; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine III, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Itariu B; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine III, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Kautzky-Willer A; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine III, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Winhofer Y; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Internal Medicine III, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Biosensors (Basel) ; 12(5)2022 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1875480
ABSTRACT
Glucose management indicator (GMI) is frequently used as a substitute for HbA1c, especially when using telemedicine. Discordances between GMI and HbA1c were previously mostly reported in populations with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) using real-time CGM. Our aim was to investigate the accordance between GMI and HbA1c in patients with diabetes using intermittent scanning CGM (isCGM). In this retrospective cross-sectional study, patients with diabetes who used isCGM >70% of the time of the investigated time periods were included. GMI of four different time spans (between 14 and 30 days), covering a period of 3 months, reflected by the HbA1c, were investigated. The influence of clinical- and isCGM-derived parameters on the discordance was assessed. We included 278 patients (55% T1DM; 33% type 2 diabetes (T2DM)) with a mean HbA1c of 7.63%. The mean GMI of the four time periods was between 7.19% and 7.25%. On average, the absolute deviation between the four calculated GMIs and HbA1c ranged from 0.6% to 0.65%. The discordance was greater with increased BMI, a diagnosis of T2DM, and a greater difference between the most recent GMI and GMI assessed 8 to 10 weeks prior to HbA1c assessment. Our data shows that, especially in patients with increased BMI and T2DM, this difference is more pronounced and should therefore be considered when making therapeutic decisions.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bios12050288

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bios12050288