Your browser doesn't support javascript.
SARS-CoV-2 Igg seroprevalence in IBD patients treated with biologics: first vs. second pandemic wave in a prospective study.
Mossa, M; Neri, B; Montesano, L; Salvatori, S; Marafini, I; Scucchi, L; Lolli, E; Massoud, R; Petruzziello, C; Bernardini, S; Calabrese, E; Monteleone, G; Biancone, L.
  • Mossa M; Department of Systems Medicine, Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. biancone@med.uniroma2.it.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 26(10): 3787-3796, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1876427
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

In a prospective study, SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence was assessed during the second pandemic wave (W2) in a cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients using biologics. The secondary aim was to compare, in the same cohort, the frequency of seropositivity and of COVID-19 during the second vs. the first (W1) wave. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

From November 2020 to March 2021, SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity and the prevalence of COVID-19 were assessed in a cohort of IBD patients using biologics already studied at W1. INCLUSION CRITERIA age ≥ 18 years; diagnosis of IBD; follow-up; written consent. EXCLUSION CRITERIA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Risk factors for infection, compatible symptoms, history of infection or COVID-19, nasopharyngeal swab test were recorded. Data were expressed as median [range]. The χ2 test, Student's t-test, logistic regression analysis was used.

RESULTS:

IBD cohort at W1 and W2 included 85 patients 45 CD (52.9%), 40 UC (47.1%). When comparing the same 85 patients at W2 vs. W1, a higher SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence at W2 was at the limit of the statistical significance (9.4% vs. 2.3%; p=0.05). The prevalence of COVID-19 at W2 vs. W1 was 3.5% (3/85) vs. 0% (0/85) (p=0.08). Contacts with COVID-19 patients and symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were more frequent at W2 vs. W1 (18.8 % vs. 0%; p=0.0001; 34.1% vs. 15.3%; p=0.004). At W2, history of contacts and new onset diarrhea were more frequent in seropositive patients [4/8 (50%) vs. 12/77 (15.6%); p=0.01 and 4/8 (50%) vs. 2/77 (2.6%); p=0.0001]. At W2, the risk factors for seropositivity included cough, fever, new onset diarrhea, rhinitis, arthromyalgia, dysgeusia/anosmia at univariate (p<0.05), but not at multivariate analysis. History of contacts was the only risk factor for seropositivity at univariate (p=0.03), but not at multivariate analysis (p=0.1).

CONCLUSIONS:

During W2, characterized by a high viral spread, IBD and biologics appeared not to increase the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 disease. New onset diarrhea mimicking IBD relapse may be observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biological Products / Inflammatory Bowel Diseases / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: English Journal: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci Journal subject: Pharmacology / Toxicology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Eurrev_202205_28875

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biological Products / Inflammatory Bowel Diseases / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: English Journal: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci Journal subject: Pharmacology / Toxicology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Eurrev_202205_28875