Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Outcomes With Direct and Indirect Thrombin Inhibition During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19.
Saeed, Omar; Farooq, Muhammad; Kuntzman, Matthew; Patel, Snehal R; Stein, Louis H; Cavarocchi, Nicholas; Silvestry, Scott; Reyes Gil, Morayma; Billett, Henny H; Jorde, Ulrich P; Goldstein, Daniel J.
  • Saeed O; From the Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Farooq M; From the Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Kuntzman M; From the Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Patel SR; From the Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Stein LH; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Newark-Beth Isreal Medical Center, RWJ Barnabas Health System, Newark, New Jersey.
  • Cavarocchi N; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Advent Health Transplant Institute, Orlando, Florida.
  • Silvestry S; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Advent Health Transplant Institute, Orlando, Florida.
  • Reyes Gil M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Billett HH; Division of Hematology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Jorde UP; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Goldstein DJ; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College Medicine, Bronx, New York.
ASAIO J ; 68(12): 1428-1433, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1878844
ABSTRACT
Anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for Coronovirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be performed by direct or indirect thrombin inhibitors but differences in outcomes with these agents are uncertain. A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted. All consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 placed on ECMO between March 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021 in participating centers, were included. Patients were divided in groups receiving either a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) or an indirect thrombin inhibitor such as unfractionated heparin (UFH). Overall, 455 patients with COVID-19 from 17 centers were placed on ECMO during the study period. Forty-four patients did not receive anticoagulation. Of the remaining 411 patients, DTI was used in 160 (39%) whereas 251 (61%) received UFH. At 90-days, in-hospital mortality was 50% (DTI) and 61% (UFH), adjusted hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-1.32. Deep vein thrombosis [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.60, 95% CI 0.90-6.65], ischemic (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 0.18-14.0), and hemorrhagic (aOR1.22, 95% CI 0.39-3.87) stroke were similar with DTI in comparison to UFH. Bleeding requiring transfusion was lower in patients receiving DTI (aOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.87). Anticoagulants that directly inhibit thrombin are associated with similar in-hospital mortality, stroke, and venous thrombosis and do not confer a higher risk of clinical bleeding in comparison to conventional heparin during ECMO for COVID-19.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Stroke / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: ASAIO J Journal subject: Transplantation Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Stroke / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: ASAIO J Journal subject: Transplantation Year: 2022 Document Type: Article