Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Experiences of personal protective equipment by Australian healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020: A cross-sectional study.
Ayton, Darshini; Soh, Sze-Ee; Berkovic, Danielle; Parker, Catriona; Yu, Kathryn; Honeyman, Damian; Manocha, Rameesh; MacIntyre, Raina; Ananda-Rajah, Michelle.
  • Ayton D; Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Soh SE; Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Berkovic D; School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Parker C; Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Yu K; Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Honeyman D; Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Manocha R; General Medical Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • MacIntyre R; Central Clinical School Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ananda-Rajah M; Public Health Unit, Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0269484, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1879324
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to capture Australian frontline healthcare workers' (HCWs) experiences with personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This was a cross-sectional study using an online survey consisting of five domains demographics; self-assessment of COVID risk; PPE access; PPE training and confidence; and anxiety. Participants were recruited from community and hospital healthcare settings in Australia, including doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, paramedics, and aged care and support staff. Data analysis was descriptive with free-text responses analysed using qualitative content analysis and multivariable analysis performed for predictors of confidence, bullying, staff furlough and anxiety. The 2258 respondents, comprised 80% women, 49% doctors and 40% nurses, based in hospital (39%) or community (57%) settings. Key findings indicated a lack of PPE training (20%), calls for fit testing, insufficient PPE (25%), reuse or extended use of PPE (47%); confusion about changing guidelines (48%) and workplace bullying over PPE (77%). An absence of in-person workplace PPE training was associated with lower confidence in using PPE (OR 0.21, 95%CI 0.12, 0.37) and a higher likelihood of workplace bullying (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.00, 2.03) perhaps reflecting deficiencies in workplace culture. Deficiencies in PPE availability, access and training linking to workplace bullying, can have negative physical and psychological impacts on a female dominant workforce critical to business as usual operations and pandemic response.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Stress / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0269484

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Stress / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0269484