Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients.
Damodaran, Srinath; Kulkarni, Anuja Vijay; Gunaseelan, Vikneswaran; Raj, Vimal; Kanchi, Muralidhar.
  • Damodaran S; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Kulkarni AV; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Gunaseelan V; Department of Clinical Research, Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Raj V; Department of Radiology, Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Kanchi M; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Narayana Health City, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Anaesth ; 66(5): 368-374, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1879556
ABSTRACT
Background and

Aims:

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a very useful tool to quickly assess cardiorespiratory function in coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 patients. The objective of this study was to test the agreement between manual and automated B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients using AI integrated POCUS. In addition, we investigated the inter-observer, intra-observer variability and reliability of assessment of echocardiographic parameters using AI by a novice.

Methods:

Two experienced sonographers in POCUS and one novice learner independently and consecutively performed ultrasound assessment of B-lines counting, LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI in 83 suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases which included both manual and AI methods.

Results:

Agreement between automated and manual assessment of LVOT-VTI, and IVC-CI were excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.98, P < 0.001]. Intra-observer reliability and inter-observer reliability of these parameters were excellent [ICC 0.96-0.99, P < 0.001]. Moreover, agreement between novice and experts using AI for LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI assessment was also excellent [ICC 0.95-0.97, P < 0.001]. However, correlation and intra-observer reliability between automated and manual B-lines counting was moderate [(ICC) 0.52-0.53, P < 0.001] and [ICC 0.56-0.69, P < 0.001], respectively. Inter-observer reliability was good [ICC 0.79-0.87, P < 0.001]. Agreement of B-lines counting between novice and experts using AI was weak [ICC 0.18, P < 0.001].

Conclusion:

AI-guided assessment of LVOT-VTI, IVC-CI and B-lines counting is reliable and consistent with manual assessment in COVID-19 patients. Novices can reliably estimate LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI using AI software in COVID-19 patients.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: Indian J Anaesth Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ija.ija_1008_21

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: Indian J Anaesth Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ija.ija_1008_21