Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation from upper airway suctioning assessed during tracheal intubation and extubation sequences in anaesthetized patients.
Shrimpton, A J; Brown, J M; Cook, T M; Penfold, C M; Reid, J P; Pickering, A E.
  • Shrimpton AJ; Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: andy.shrimpton@bristol.ac.uk.
  • Brown JM; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
  • Cook TM; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal United Hospital NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
  • Penfold CM; Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Reid JP; School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Pickering AE; Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Hosp Infect ; 124: 13-21, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1882202
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Open respiratory suctioning is defined as an aerosol generating procedure (AGP). Laryngopharyngeal suctioning, used to clear secretions during anaesthesia, is widely managed as an AGP. However, it is uncertain whether upper airway suctioning should be designated as an AGP due to the lack of both aerosol and epidemiological evidence.

AIM:

To assess the relative risk of aerosol generation by upper airway suctioning during tracheal intubation and extubation in anaesthetized patients.

METHODS:

This prospective environmental monitoring study was undertaken in an ultraclean operating theatre setting to assay aerosol concentrations during intubation and extubation sequences, including upper airway suctioning, for patients undergoing surgery (N=19). An optical particle sizer (particle size 0.3-10 µm) sampled aerosol 20 cm above the patient's mouth. Baseline recordings (background, tidal breathing and volitional coughs) were followed by intravenous induction of anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade. Four periods of laryngopharyngeal suctioning were performed with a Yankauer sucker pre-laryngoscopy, post-intubation, pre-extubation and post-extubation.

FINDINGS:

Aerosol was reliably detected {median 65 [interquartile range (IQR) 39-259] particles/L} above background [median 4.8 (IQR 1-7) particles/L, P<0.0001] when sampling in close proximity to the patient's mouth during tidal breathing. Upper airway suctioning was associated with a much lower average aerosol concentration than breathing [median 6.0 (IQR 0-12) particles/L, P=0.0007], and was indistinguishable from background (P>0.99). Peak aerosol concentrations recorded during suctioning [median 45 (IQR 30-75) particles/L] were much lower than during volitional coughs [median 1520 (IQR 600-4363) particles/L, P<0.0001] and tidal breathing [median 540 (IQR 300-1826) particles/L, P<0.0001].

CONCLUSION:

Upper airway suctioning during airway management was not associated with a higher aerosol concentration compared with background, and was associated with a much lower aerosol concentration compared with breathing and coughing. Upper airway suctioning should not be designated as a high-risk AGP.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cough / Airway Extubation Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cough / Airway Extubation Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2022 Document Type: Article