Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison between the analytical sensitivity and clinical performance of two cobas SARS-CoV-2 tests based on high-throughput and point-of-care systems.
Lin, Tsai-Hsiu; Bui, Ngoc-Niem; Chang, Yu-Chang; Hsu, Li-Yun; Su, Yang-Di; Chang, Chieh-Min; Hong, Wei-An; Le, Uyen Nguyen Phuong; Huang, Su-Hua; Lin, Cheng-Wen.
  • Lin TH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Bui NN; Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Chang YC; Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Hsu LY; Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho 94117, Viet Nam.
  • Su YD; Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Chang CM; Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Hong WA; Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Le UNP; Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Huang SH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  • Lin CW; Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Biomedicine (Taipei) ; 12(2): 40-46, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1897355
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

This study examined analytical sensitivity, specificity, and the clinical performance in detecting SARS-CoV-2 of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test based on the high-throughput Cobas 6800 system and the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test based on the point-of-care cobas Liat system.

Methods:

The commercial reagents containing SARS-CoV-2 RNA subgenomes were diluted for assessing the sensitivity of the RT-qPCR assay. 385 nasopharyngeal swab specimens taken from contacts of COVID-19 cases were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 detection with both Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Tests.

Results:

In analytical sensitivity assays, the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test on the Liat system had a lower limit of detection (12.5-25 copies/mL) than the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test on the cobas 6800 system (25-50 copies/mL). In clinical performance assays, the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test demonstrated 89.36% (42 out of 47) PPA (positive percent agreement) and 98.82% (334 out of 338) NPA (negative percent agreement) compared to the results of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B test. Among five discordant specimens, four had the positive result of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test, but the negative result of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test. Moreover, these discordant specimens had the Ct values of greater than 33 for the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test, implying a very small number of virions in the samples. Remarkably, four specimens with a presumptive positive result of the cobas SARS-CoV-2 test had been confirmed by the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test. Next, the scatter plots of the Ct values showed a highly positive correlation between cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test and the cobas SARS-CoV-2 Test (R-squared value = 0.954-0.962).

Conclusions:

Both SARS-CoV2 tests of the cobas 6800 and Liat systems produce reliable high throughput and point-of-care assays respectively for the early virus detection and the personal care decision-making during COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Biomedicine (Taipei) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2211-8039.1334

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Biomedicine (Taipei) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 2211-8039.1334