Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Telehealth cancer care consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of the experiences of Australians affected by cancer.
White, Victoria; Bastable, Alice; Solo, Ilana; Sherwell, Seleena; Thomas, Sangeetha; Blum, Rob; Torres, Javier; Maxwell-Davis, Natalie; Alexander, Kathy; Piper, Amanda.
  • White V; School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. Vicki.white@deakin.edu.au.
  • Bastable A; Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Solo I; Loddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo, VIC, Australia.
  • Sherwell S; Southern Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Thomas S; School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Blum R; Loddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo, VIC, Australia.
  • Torres J; Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC, Australia.
  • Maxwell-Davis N; Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, VIC, Australia.
  • Alexander K; Consumer Representative, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Piper A; Consumer Representative, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(8): 6659-6668, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1899175
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth was rapidly rolled out in health services across Australia including those delivering cancer care. This study aimed to understand people with cancer and carers' experiences with telehealth for cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions.

METHOD:

Semi-structured interviews conducted with people with cancer and carers via telephone or online video link between December 2020 and May 2021. Participants were recruited through cancer networks and social media. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis undertaken.

RESULTS:

Twenty-three patients and 5 carers were interviewed. Telephone-based appointments were most common. Responses to telehealth were influenced by existing relationships with doctors, treatment/cancer stage and type of appointment. Four themes were derived (i) benefits, (ii) quality of care concerns, (iii) involving carers, and (iv) optimising use of telehealth. Benefits included efficiency and reduced travel. Quality of care concerns identified subthemes transactional feel to appointments; difficulties for rapport; suitability for appointment type and adequacy for monitoring. Both patients and carers noted a lack of opportunity for carers to participate in telephone-based appointments. Aligning appointment mode (i.e. telehealth or in person) with appointment purpose and ensuring telehealth was the patient's choice were seen as essential for its ongoing use. DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSIONS:

While telehealth has benefits, its potential to reduce the quality of interactions with clinicians made it less attractive for cancer patients. Patient-centred guidelines that ensure patient choice, quality communication, and alignment with appointment purpose may help to increase telehealth's utility for people affected by cancer.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Support Care Cancer Journal subject: Neoplasms / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00520-022-07021-6

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Support Care Cancer Journal subject: Neoplasms / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00520-022-07021-6