Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The influence of time on the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing.
Torres Ortiz, Arturo; Fenn Torrente, Fernanda; Twigg, Adam; Hatcher, James; Saso, Anja; Lam, Tanya; Johnson, Marina; Wagstaffe, Helen; Dhillon, Rishi; Mai, Anabelle Lea; Goldblatt, David; Still, Rachel; Buckland, Matthew; Gilmour, Kimberly; Grandjean, Louis.
  • Torres Ortiz A; Department of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
  • Fenn Torrente F; Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, Paddington, London, W2 1NY, UK.
  • Twigg A; Department of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
  • Hatcher J; UCL Medical School, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London, WC1E 6DE, UK.
  • Saso A; Department of Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
  • Lam T; School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 111, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
  • Johnson M; Department of Microbiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
  • Wagstaffe H; Department of Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
  • Dhillon R; Department of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, LSHTM, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
  • Mai AL; MRC Gambia at LSHTM, PO Box 273, Fajara, The Gambia.
  • Goldblatt D; Department of Infectious Diseases, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
  • Still R; Department of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
  • Buckland M; Department of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
  • Gilmour K; Public Health Wales Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park Way, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, UK.
  • Grandjean L; Clinical Immunology, Camelia Botnar Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 10517, 2022 06 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1900658
ABSTRACT
Sensitive serological testing is essential to estimate the proportion of the population exposed or infected with SARS-CoV-2, to guide booster vaccination and to select patients for treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The performance of serological tests is usually evaluated at 14-21 days post infection. This approach fails to take account of the important effect of time on test performance after infection or exposure has occurred. We performed parallel serological testing using 4 widely used assays (a multiplexed SARS-CoV-2 Nucleoprotein (N), Spike (S) and Receptor Binding Domain assay from Meso Scale Discovery (MSD), the Roche Elecsys-Nucleoprotein (Roche-N) and Spike (Roche-S) assays and the Abbott Nucleoprotein assay (Abbott-N) on serial positive monthly samples collected as part of the Co-STARs study ( www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04380896) up to 200 days following infection. Our findings demonstrate the considerable effect of time since symptom onset on the diagnostic sensitivity of different assays. Using a time-to-event analysis, we demonstrated that 50% of the Abbott nucleoprotein assays will give a negative result after 175 days (median survival time 95% CI 168-185 days), compared to the better performance over time of the Roche Elecsys nucleoprotein assay (93% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 88-97%). Assays targeting the spike protein showed a lower decline over the follow-up period, both for the MSD spike assay (97% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 95-99%) and the Roche Elecsys spike assay (95% survival probability at 200 days, 95% CI 93-97%). The best performing quantitative Roche Elecsys Spike assay showed no evidence of waning Spike antibody titers over the 200-day time course of the study. We have shown that compared to other assays evaluated, the Abbott-N assay fails to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as time passes since infection. In contrast the Roche Elecsys Spike Assay and the MSD assay maintained a high sensitivity for the 200-day duration of the study. These limitations of the Abbott assay should be considered when quantifying the immune correlates of protection or the need for SARS-CoV-2 antibody therapy. The high levels of maintained detectable neutralizing spike antibody titers identified by the quantitative Roche Elecsys assay is encouraging and provides further evidence in support of long-lasting SARS-CoV-2 protection following natural infection.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid / Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-022-14351-2

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid / Vaccines Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-022-14351-2