Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Tracking the psychological and socio-economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A methodological report from Wave 5 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study.
McBride, Orla; Butter, Sarah; Murphy, Jamie; Hartman, Todd K; McKay, Ryan; Hyland, Philip; Shevlin, Mark; Bennett, Kate M; Stocks, Thomas V A; Lloyd, Alex; Gibson-Miller, Jilly; Levita, Liat; Mason, Liam; Martinez, Anton P; Vallières, Frédérique; Karatzias, Thanos; Bentall, Richard P.
  • McBride O; Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
  • Butter S; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Murphy J; Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
  • Hartman TK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • McKay R; Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
  • Hyland P; Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
  • Shevlin M; Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.
  • Bennett KM; University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Stocks TVA; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Lloyd A; Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
  • Gibson-Miller J; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Levita L; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Mason L; University College London, London, UK.
  • Martinez AP; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
  • Vallières F; Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Karatzias T; Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Bentall RP; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 31(4): e1928, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1905915
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study was established in March 2020 to monitor the psychological and socio-economic impact of the pandemic in the UK and other countries. This paper describes the protocol for Wave 5 (March-April 2021).

METHODS:

The survey assessed COVID-19 related experiences; experiences of common mental health disorders; psychological characteristics; and social and political attitudes. Adults who participated in any previous wave (N = 4949) were re-invited to participate. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the longitudinal panel was nationally representative in terms of gender, age, and household income, amongst other factors.

RESULTS:

Overall, 2520 adults participated. A total of 2377 adults who participated in the previous survey wave (November-December 2020) were re-interviewed at Wave 5 (61.5% retention rate). Attrition between these two waves was predicted by younger age, lower household income, children living in the household, and treatment for mental health difficulties. Of the adults recruited into the C19PRC study at baseline, 57.4% (N = 1162) participated in Wave 5. The raking procedure re-balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1.5% of population estimates for selected socio-demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSION:

This paper outlines the growing strength of the publicly available C19PRC Study data for COVID-19-related interdisciplinary research.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Mpr.1928

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Mpr.1928