Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Virtual respiratory therapy delivered through a smartphone app: a mixed-methods randomised usability study.
Baxter, Clarence Anthony; Carroll, Julie-Anne; Keogh, Brendan; Vandelanotte, Corneel.
  • Baxter CA; School of Public Health & Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Health, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia c.baxter@hdr.qut.edu.au.
  • Carroll JA; School of Public Health & Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Health, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • Keogh B; Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Creative Industries Education and Social Justice, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • Vandelanotte C; Physical Activity Research Group, Central Queensland University Appleton Institute, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 9(1)2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1909781
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A new smartphone app (QUT Inspire) has been developed to detect inspiratory sound and deliver virtual incentive spirometry (ISy), a respiratory therapy technique used in postoperative recuperation, management of some chronic conditions and with potential applications in SARS-CoV-2 rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare the usability of this new app with a clinical ISy device as measured by effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction.

METHODS:

In this mixed-methods randomised usability study, healthy volunteers (aged 39.2±12.2 years, n=24) compared inspirations using the QUT Inspire app and a Triflo II clinical ISy device. A post-test questionnaire and a semi-structured interview explored dimensions of usability regarding the new app.

RESULTS:

The duration of inspirations performed using the QUT Inspire app (7.3±2.0 s) were comparable with use of the Triflo II ISy device (7.5±2.3 s). No artefacts arising from the order of device testing were identified. App users held their phones adjacent but not proximal to their mouths (13.6±6.4 cm), notwithstanding instructions to keep the phone less than 5 cm away for optimal breath sound detection. The use of onscreen text or video instructional materials did not result in a significant reduction in this distance. Participants reported clear preferences for the app (100%, n=24) to motivate persistence with repeated inspirations. App gamification features such as a timer (75%, n=18) and breath counter (83.3%, n=20) were well regarded. Analysis of semi-structured interviews identified four main themes arising from this study visual reward from responsive app animations, clinical look and feel influencing credibility, perceived effort affecting engagement and selective adoption of gamification features.

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrates that a virtual ISy app can be effective, efficient and have high satisfaction. Improvements informed by this research include use of additional phone sensors to optimise sound detection and minimising the distance that phones are held from the user's mouth. Further research in randomised controlled trials are needed to evaluate performance of this app in clinical contexts where ISy is currently employed.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mobile Applications / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjresp-2022-001221

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mobile Applications / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjresp-2022-001221