Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Role of literacy, fear and hesitancy on acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among village health volunteers in Thailand.
Siewchaisakul, Pallop; Sarakarn, Pongdech; Nanthanangkul, Sirinya; Longkul, Jirapat; Boonchieng, Waraporn; Wungrath, Jukkrit.
  • Siewchaisakul P; Faculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  • Sarakarn P; The Center of Excellence in Community Health Informatics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  • Nanthanangkul S; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
  • Longkul J; ASEAN Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research Group, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
  • Boonchieng W; Research Publishing and Academic support Department, Udonthani Cancer Hospital, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Nong Phai, Thailand.
  • Wungrath J; Faculty of Public health, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0270023, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1910666
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The roles of literacy, fear and hesitancy were investigated for acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine (AV) types among village health volunteers (VHVs) in Thailand. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was conducted using an unidentified online questionnaire to assess literacy, fear and hesitancy of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among Thai VHVs between 1 and 15 October 2021. The questionnaire was developed based on the HLVa-IT (Health Literacy Vaccinale degli adulti in Italiano) for vaccine literacy (VL), using an adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS) for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (VH) and Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCoV-19S) for the distress of COVID-19 vaccine. The effects of VL, VH and vaccine fear (VF) on AV were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS:

A total of 5,312 VHVs completed the questionnaire. After adjustment with variables in the multivariable analysis, the VL score was insignificantly associated with increased vaccination (aOR = 1.002; (95%CI 0.994-1.01)), while VF and VH significantly decreased the chance of vaccination, aOR = 0.966 (95%CI 0.953-0.978) and aOR = 0.969; (95%CI 0.960-0.979), respectively and VF and VH were negatively associated with AV for all types of vaccine preference, with VL showing a reverse relationship only for mRNA-based vaccines.

CONCLUSION:

VL may not increase AV among VHVs. To increase attitudes toward receiving COVID-19 vaccination in Thailand, the government and health-related organizations should instigate policies to significantly reduce VF and VH among Thai VHVs.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0270023

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0270023