Comparison of Two RNA Extraction Methods for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples.
Diagnostics (Basel)
; 12(7)2022 Jun 27.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1911244
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 is essential in order to restrict the spread of the pandemic, and different approaches for SARS-CoV-2 testing have been proposed as cost-effective and less time-consuming alternatives. For virus detection, the real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique is still the "gold standard" for accuracy and reliability, but its performance is affected by the efficiency of nucleic acid extraction methods.OBJECTIVE:
In order to improve the SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic workflow, we compared a "standard" commercially available kit, based on viral RNA extraction from human swab samples by magnetic beads, with its technological evolution. The two methods differ mainly in their time consumption (9 vs. 35 min).METHODS:
We adopted the MAGABIO PLUS VIRUS DNA/RNA PURIFICATION KIT II (BIOER), defined as "standard", with the automatic extractor BIOER (GenePure Pro fully automatic nucleic acid purification system) to isolate RNA from nasopharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. We tested this kit with a new faster version of the first one, defined as "rapid" (MAGABIO PLUS VIRUS RNA PURIFICATION KIT II). RESULTS ANDCONCLUSION:
The two evaluated procedures provided similar analytical results, but the faster method proved to be a more suitable tool for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharyngeal swabs, due to a more rapid availability of results, which may contribute to improving both clinical decision making and patient safety.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
International databases
Database:
MEDLINE
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
/
Experimental Studies
/
Prognostic study
Language:
English
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Diagnostics12071561
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS