Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The CDC Worksite Health ScoreCard: A Tool to Advance Workplace Health Promotion Programs and Practices.
Roemer, Enid Chung; Kent, Karen B; Goetzel, Ron Z; Krill, John; Williams, Farrah Spellman; Lang, Jason E.
  • Roemer EC; Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205. Email: eroemer1@jhu.edu.
  • Kent KB; Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Goetzel RZ; Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Krill J; Institute for Health and Productivity Studies, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Williams FS; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Lang JE; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 19: E32, 2022 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1912038
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The CDC Worksite Health ScoreCard (ScoreCard) is a free, publicly available survey tool designed to help employers assess the extent to which they have implemented evidence-based interventions or strategies at their worksites to improve the health and well-being of employees. We examined how, how broadly, and to what effect the ScoreCard has been applied.

METHODS:

We analyzed peer-reviewed and grey literature along with the ScoreCard database of online submissions from January 2012 through January 2021. Our inclusion criteria were workplace settings, adult working populations, and explicit use of the ScoreCard.

RESULTS:

We found that the ScoreCard had been used in 1) surveillance efforts by states, 2) health promotion training and technical assistance, 3) research on workplace health promotion program effectiveness, and 4) employer efforts to improve program design, implementation, and evaluation.

CONCLUSION:

The ScoreCard has been used as intended to support the development, planning, monitoring, and continuous improvement of workplace health promotion programs. Our review revealed gaps in the tool and opportunities to improve it by 1) enhancing surveillance efforts, 2) engaging employers in low-wage industries, 3) adding new questions or topic areas, and 4) conducting quantitative studies on the relationship between improvements in the ScoreCard and employee health and well-being outcomes.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Health / Workplace Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Occupational Health / Workplace Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article