Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Landscape of coronavirus disease 2019 clinical trials: New frontiers and challenges.
Halabi, Susan; Zhou, Jinyi; He, Yijie; Bressler, Linda R; Hernandez, Adrian F; Turner, Nicholas A; Hong, Hwanhee.
  • Halabi S; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Zhou J; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA.
  • He Y; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Bressler LR; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hernandez AF; University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Turner NA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Health, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hong H; Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Clin Trials ; 19(5): 561-572, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1916862
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIM:

The number of coronavirus disease 2019 deaths and cases continues to increase globally. Novel therapies are urgently needed to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019. We sought to provide a critical review of trials designed during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Our primary goal was to provide a critical review of the landscape of clinical trials designed to address the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Specifically, we were interested in assessing the design of phase II/III and phase III interventional trials.

METHODS:

We utilized the ClinicalTrials.gov database to include trials registered between 1 December 2019 and 11 April 2021 to survey the current landscape of clinical trials for coronavirus disease 2019. Variables extracted included National Clinical Trial number, title, location, sponsor, study type, start date, completion date, gender group, age group, primary outcome, secondary outcome, overall status, and associated references.

RESULTS:

About 57% of studies were interventional, 14.5% were phase III trials, and the majority of the therapeutic trials included hospitalized patients. There were 52 primary composite outcomes and 285 unique interventions spanning 10 drug classes. The outcomes, disease severity, and comparators varied substantially across trials, and the trials were often too small to be definitive.

CONCLUSION:

These findings are relevant as we strongly advocate for global coordination of efforts through the use of common platforms that enable harmonizing of endpoints, collection of common key variables and clear definition of disease severity to have clinically meaningful results from clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Trials Journal subject: Medicine / Therapeutics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 17407745221105106

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Trials Journal subject: Medicine / Therapeutics Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 17407745221105106