Your browser doesn't support javascript.
From the Triage to the Intermediate Area: A Simple and Fast Model for COVID-19 in the Emergency Department.
Poggiali, Erika; Fabrizi, Enrico; Bastoni, Davide; Iannicelli, Teresa; Galluzzo, Claudia; Canini, Chiara; Cillis, Maria Grazia; Ponzi, Davide Giulio; Magnacavallo, Andrea; Vercelli, Andrea.
  • Poggiali E; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Fabrizi E; DISES & DSS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Bastoni D; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Iannicelli T; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Galluzzo C; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Canini C; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Cillis MG; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Ponzi DG; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Magnacavallo A; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
  • Vercelli A; Emergency Department, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(13)2022 06 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1917466
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The early identification of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is still a real challenge for emergency departments (ED). First, we aimed to develop a score, based on the use of the lung ultrasonography (LUS), in addition to the pre-triage interview, to correctly address patients; second, we aimed to prove the usefulness of a three-path organization (COVID-19, not-COVID-19 and intermediate) compared to a two-path organization (COVID-19, non-COVID-19).

METHODS:

We retrospectively analysed 292 patients admitted to our ED from 10 April to 15 April 2020, with a definite diagnosis of positivity (93 COVID-19 patients) or negativity (179 not-COVID-19 patients) for SARS-COV-2 infection. Using a logistic regression, we found a set of predictors for infection selected from the pre-triage interview items and the LUS findings, which contribute with a different weight to the final score. Then, we compared the organization of two different pathways.

RESULTS:

The most informative factors for classifying the patient are known nasopharyngeal swab positivity, close contact with a COVID-19 patient, fever associated with respiratory symptoms, respiratory failure, anosmia or dysgeusia, and the ultrasound criteria of diffuse alveolar interstitial syndrome, absence of B-lines and presence of pleural effusion. Their sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC-ROC are, respectively, 0.83, 0.81, 0.82 and 0.81. The most significant difference between the two pathways is the percentage of not-COVID-19 patients assigned to the COVID-19 area, that is, 10.6% (19/179) in the three-path organization, and 18.9% (34/179) in the two-path organization (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study suggests the possibility to use a score based on the pre-triage interview and the LUS findings to correctly manage the patients admitted to the ED, and the importance of an intermediate area to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the ED and, as a consequence, in the hospital.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph19138070

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph19138070