Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Clinician Perspectives on Monoclonal Antibody Treatment for High-Risk Outpatients with COVID-19: Implications for Implementation and Equitable Access.
Kwan, Bethany M; Sobczak, Chelsea; Beaty, Laurel; Wynia, Matthew K; DeCamp, Matthew; Owen, Vanessa; Ginde, Adit A.
  • Kwan BM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. bethany.kwan@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Sobczak C; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. bethany.kwan@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Beaty L; Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. bethany.kwan@cuanschutz.edu.
  • Wynia MK; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • DeCamp M; Center for Innovative Design & Analysis, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Owen V; Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Ginde AA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(13): 3426-3434, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1919971
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is an urgent need to identify and address factors influencing uptake and equitable access to monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment for high-risk outpatients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess clinician knowledge, beliefs, and experiences regarding obtaining mAb treatment for eligible patients. DESIGN AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Survey of clinicians (N = 374) practicing in the state of Colorado who care for patients with COVID-19 in primary care, emergency medicine, and other clinical settings. MAIN MEASURE(S) Diffusion of innovation theory concepts including knowledge, perceived strength of evidence, barriers, and experience with, ease of use, preparedness, and feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of mAb referral systems and processes. KEY

RESULTS:

Most respondents indicated little to no knowledge about mAb therapies for COVID-19 (67%, 74%, 77%, for bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab+etesivimab, and casirivimab+imdevimab, respectively). About half reported little to no familiarity with eligibility criteria (50.9%) and did not know the strength of evidence (31%, 43%, 52%, for bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab+etesivimab, and casirivimab+imdevimab, respectively). Lack of knowledge or confidence in treatment was a top barrier to mAbs use; other barriers included complicated referral processes, patients not eligible when seen, and out-of-pocket costs concerns. Respondents rated four mAb referral steps as generally acceptable, appropriate, and feasible to complete in their primary outpatient clinical setting. Only 24% indicated their clinical setting was very prepared to facilitate referrals, 40% had ever referred a patient for mAbs, and 43% intended to refer a patient in the next month.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinician education on strength of evidence and eligibility criteria for mAbs is needed. However, education alone is not sufficient. Given the urgent need to rapidly scale up access to treatment and reduce hospitalizations and death from COVID-19, more efficient, equitable systems and processes for referral and delivery of care, such as those coordinated by health systems, public health departments, or disaster management services, are warranted.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Outpatients / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Gen Intern Med Journal subject: Internal Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S11606-022-07702-2

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Outpatients / COVID-19 Drug Treatment Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Gen Intern Med Journal subject: Internal Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S11606-022-07702-2