Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Design and testing of the safety of the SARUS-CPR hood for novice resuscitators.
Wasik, P; McLeod, G A; Mountain, R; Watts, S; Briggs, H; Maini, N; Belford, I; McGuire, B; Brown, W; Clark, R; Eley, I; Richardson, E; Stonebridge, P.
  • Wasik P; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • McLeod GA; Consultant Anaesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Mountain R; Honorary Professor, 3042University of Dundee, UK.
  • Watts S; Consultant ENT surgeon, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Briggs H; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Maini N; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Belford I; Consultant Anaesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • McGuire B; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Brown W; Consultant Anaesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Clark R; 9536Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
  • Eley I; 9536Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
  • Richardson E; 9536Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
  • Stonebridge P; 59805Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Scott Med J ; 67(4): 189-195, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1925715
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Bystanders should be protected against aerosols, droplets, saliva, blood and vomitus during resuscitation after cardiac arrest The SARUS (safer - airway - resuscitation) CPR airway hood™ is a clear plastic cover and integrated mask that envelopes the head and torso. Our objectives were to test leakage using saline aerosol generation tests, then assess the performance of the hood during mock cardio-pulmonary resuscitation on a manikin.

METHODS:

A checklist was validated by comparing the performance of 10 novices against 10 experts during mock resuscitation. Thereafter, 15 novices were tested with and without the hood, in a randomised cross-over study, one week apart.

RESULTS:

Laboratory analysis showed a > 99% reduction of saline particles detected 5 cm, 75 cm and 165 cm above volunteers wearing the hood. On manikins, experts scored better compared to novices, 8.5 (0.7) vs 7.6 (1.2), difference (95%CI) 0.9 (0.4-1.3), P = 0.0004. Novice performance was equivalent using the hood and standard equipment, 7.3 (1.4) vs 7.3 (1.1) respectively, difference (90%CI) 0.0 (-0.3 - 0.3), P = 0.90.

CONCLUSION:

Aerosol transmission reduced in the breathing zone. Simulated resuscitation by novices was equivalent with and without the hood.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Heart Arrest Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Scott Med J Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 00369330221112186

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Heart Arrest Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Scott Med J Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 00369330221112186