The State of Hospital Infection Services in the UK: National Workforce Survey 2021

ABSTRACT

Introduction: With the evolution of centralised ‘hub and spoke’ microbiology services, the expansion of infectious diseases as a medical specialty and the advent of joint infection training pathways, the infection services within the United Kingdom (UK) are experiencing a period of rapid change. Despite this, to date there has been no comprehensive description of the distribution of specialty staffing and service provision across the country. To this end, the British Infection Association (BIA), in conjunction with the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath), has undertaken a national survey of National Health Service (NHS) infection services. Methods: Questions were compiled following consultation with an expert panel including BIA Council members. An online survey was distributed to clinical leads at all UK NHS acute trusts or health boards with inpatient beds and data were collected between April and August 2021. Results: The overall response rate was 72% (108 respondents). The median number of infection consultant full time equivalents (FTE) per service was 6.1 overall (5.6 per 1000 acute beds) although this varied between the devolved nations and was lowest in centres with microbiology specialists only. Forty-three services had three or fewer FTE medically qualified infection specialists. Overall, 17.5% of all funded FTE consultant-level posts were vacant, although this was markedly higher for microbiology-accredited posts (20.3%) than for infectious diseases (ID) (9.3%) or medical virology (14.6%). There were fewer vacancies in centres with ID-accredited consultants;median 1.0 (IQR 0–2.2) versus those with microbiology only;1.8 (IQR 0–2.9). Distribution of non-consultant staff was extremely heterogenous with 44 services having none and 25 having one or less FTE (most of which employed microbiology-only accredited consultants). 30% of organisations reported at least one vacant training post. Half of the responding organisations reported at least one consultant accredited in ID but only 28 provided inpatient care with a total of 520 ‘dedicated’ ID beds, of which 235 were negative pressure side-rooms. Geographically, several large areas of the country lacked inpatient ID capacity and/or ID-accredited consultant expertise. The burden of laboratory-related and reporting work in relation to staffing levels is disproportionately greater at smaller centres;there are a median 7.7 (IQR 5.9–9.5) hours/person/week at centres with three or fewer consultants and 4.0 (IQR 2.1–6.3) at larger centres. Conclusion: Microbiology specialists continue to provide the bulk of infection services across the UK and there is marked geographical variation in staffing with regards to other specialities. With Core Infection Training now producing dual-accredited consultants, there is an untapped potential to expand inpatient ID service provision although the requirement for placements on an existing inpatient ID unit may be limiting this currently. There are extremely high vacancies rates across the country but smaller, microbiology-only centres are hardest-hit with many barely attaining the consultant numbers required to staff a safe on-call rota. Workforce planning with utilisation of the valuable expertise of non-medically-trained staff, such as Clinical Scientists, is urgently needed. The results of this survey, in conjunction with Best Practice Standards recently published by the BIA, RCPath and Royal College of Physicians can inform commissioning and delivery of infection expertise in the context of the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.