Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Machine learning to support visual auditing of home-based lateral flow immunoassay self-test results for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
Wong, Nathan C K; Meshkinfamfard, Sepehr; Turbé, Valérian; Whitaker, Matthew; Moshe, Maya; Bardanzellu, Alessia; Dai, Tianhong; Pignatelli, Eduardo; Barclay, Wendy; Darzi, Ara; Elliott, Paul; Ward, Helen; Tanaka, Reiko J; Cooke, Graham S; McKendry, Rachel A; Atchison, Christina J; Bharath, Anil A.
  • Wong NCK; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Meshkinfamfard S; London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Turbé V; London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, UK.
  • Whitaker M; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Moshe M; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Bardanzellu A; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Dai T; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Pignatelli E; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Barclay W; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Darzi A; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Elliott P; National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
  • Ward H; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Tanaka RJ; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Cooke GS; National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
  • McKendry RA; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Atchison CJ; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Bharath AA; National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Commun Med (Lond) ; 2: 78, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1927106
ABSTRACT

Background:

Lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) are being used worldwide for COVID-19 mass testing and antibody prevalence studies. Relatively simple to use and low cost, these tests can be self-administered at home, but rely on subjective interpretation of a test line by eye, risking false positives and false negatives. Here, we report on the development of ALFA (Automated Lateral Flow Analysis) to improve reported sensitivity and specificity.

Methods:

Our computational pipeline uses machine learning, computer vision techniques and signal processing algorithms to analyse images of the Fortress LFIA SARS-CoV-2 antibody self-test, and subsequently classify results as invalid, IgG negative and IgG positive. A large image library of 595,339 participant-submitted test photographs was created as part of the REACT-2 community SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence study in England, UK. Alongside ALFA, we developed an analysis toolkit which could also detect device blood leakage issues.

Results:

Automated analysis showed substantial agreement with human experts (Cohen's kappa 0.90-0.97) and performed consistently better than study participants, particularly for weak positive IgG results. Specificity (98.7-99.4%) and sensitivity (90.1-97.1%) were high compared with visual interpretation by human experts (ranges due to the varying prevalence of weak positive IgG tests in datasets).

Conclusions:

Given the potential for LFIAs to be used at scale in the COVID-19 response (for both antibody and antigen testing), even a small improvement in the accuracy of the algorithms could impact the lives of millions of people by reducing the risk of false-positive and false-negative result read-outs by members of the public. Our findings support the use of machine learning-enabled automated reading of at-home antibody lateral flow tests as a tool for improved accuracy for population-level community surveillance.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Commun Med (Lond) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S43856-022-00146-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Commun Med (Lond) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S43856-022-00146-z